Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] ipv4: ip_tunnel: Unmask upper DSCP bits in ip_tunnel_bind_dev()

[Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:45:35PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 01:36:35PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 07:51:33PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > Unmask the upper DSCP bits when initializing an IPv4 flow key via
> > > ip_tunnel_init_flow() before passing it to ip_route_output_key() so that
> > > in the future we could perform the FIB lookup according to the full DSCP
> > > value.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > >  net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> > > index 18964394d6bd..b632c128ecb7 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> > > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int ip_tunnel_bind_dev(struct net_device *dev)
> > >  
> > >  		ip_tunnel_init_flow(&fl4, iph->protocol, iph->daddr,
> > >  				    iph->saddr, tunnel->parms.o_key,
> > > -				    RT_TOS(iph->tos), dev_net(dev),
> > > +				    iph->tos & INET_DSCP_MASK, dev_net(dev),
> > 
> > The net/inet_dscp.h header file is only included in patch 6, while it's
> > needed here in patch 5.
> 
> Thanks. Probably happened when I reordered the patches. However, it
> doesn't affect bisectability since the header is included via include/net/ip.h

Okay, no need for a v2 then.
I'll ack the remaining patches.

And thanks again for your work!


> > >  				    tunnel->parms.link, tunnel->fwmark, 0, 0);
> > >  		rt = ip_route_output_key(tunnel->net, &fl4);
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.46.0
> > > 
> > 
>