From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Markku Ahvenjärvi" <mankku@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
janne.karhunen@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:18:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zu0vvRyCyUaQ2S2a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920080012.74405-2-mankku@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024, Markku Ahvenjärvi wrote:
> Running certain hypervisors under KVM on VMX suffered L1 hangs after
> launching a nested guest. The external interrupts were not processed on
> vmlaunch/vmresume due to stale VPPR, and L2 guest would resume without
> allowing L1 hypervisor to process the events.
>
> The patch ensures VPPR to be updated when checking for pending
> interrupts.
This is architecturally incorrect, PPR isn't refreshed at VM-Enter.
Aha! I wonder if the missing PPR update is due to the nested VM-Enter path
directly clearing IRR when processing a posted interrupt.
On top of https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next, does this fix things?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index a8e7bc04d9bf..a8255c6f0d51 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -3731,7 +3731,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu) == vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv) {
vmx->nested.pi_pending = true;
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
- kvm_apic_clear_irr(vcpu, vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv);
+ kvm_apic_ack_interrupt(vcpu, vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv);
}
/* Hide L1D cache contents from the nested guest. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 7:59 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 8:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-20 12:40 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-02 12:42 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-02 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 11:29 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-10 11:00 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-14 10:57 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-16 18:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-17 13:27 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-17 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zu0vvRyCyUaQ2S2a@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mankku@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.