From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tmpfs: fault in smaller chunks if large folio allocation not allowed
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zu9mbBHzI-MyRoHa@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920143654.1008756-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:36:54PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The tmpfs supports large folio, but there is some configurable options
> to enable/disable large folio allocation, and for huge=within_size,
> large folio only allowabled if it fully within i_size, so there is
> performance issue when perform write without large folio, the issue is
> similar to commit 4e527d5841e2 ("iomap: fault in smaller chunks for
> non-large folio mappings").
No. What's wrong with my earlier suggestion?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-22 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-14 14:06 [PATCH -next] tmpfs: fault in smaller chunks if large folio allocation not allowed Kefeng Wang
2024-09-15 10:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 3:55 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Kefeng Wang
2024-09-22 0:35 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-09-23 1:39 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-26 8:38 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-09-26 13:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-26 14:20 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-26 14:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-30 1:27 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-30 2:02 ` Baolin Wang
2024-09-30 2:30 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-30 2:52 ` Baolin Wang
2024-09-30 3:15 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-30 6:48 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-09 7:09 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-10-09 8:52 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-11 6:59 ` [PATCH v3] tmpfs: don't enable large folios if not supported Kefeng Wang
2024-10-12 3:59 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-14 2:36 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-10-17 14:17 ` [PATCH v4] " Kefeng Wang
2024-10-18 1:48 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zu9mbBHzI-MyRoHa@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.