All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:25:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuQTFTNTBLCziD05@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911072751.365361-7-wenst@chromium.org>

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having
> multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often
> connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals
> and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display
> panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on
> laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device
> can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that
> information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each
> device.
> 
> This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The
> current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device
> tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe
> function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction
> of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared"
> resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same
> time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include
> moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or
> pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and
> requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen
> on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based
> Lenovo Thinkpad 13S.
> 
> Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks,
> this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a
> given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of
> them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds.
> It will then enable the device that responds.
> 
> This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The
> status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set
> to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is
> needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device
> drivers running at the same time.

...

> +static int i2c_of_probe_enable_node(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	int ret;

> +	dev_info(dev, "Enabling %pOF\n", node);

Is it important to be on INFO level?

> +	struct of_changeset *ocs __free(kfree) = kzalloc(sizeof(*ocs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ocs)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	of_changeset_init(ocs);
> +	ret = of_changeset_update_prop_string(ocs, node, "status", "okay");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		/* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */
> +		of_changeset_destroy(ocs);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to
> +		 * exist as long as the change is applied.
> +		 */
> +		void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

...

> +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx)
> +{
> +	const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> +	const char *type;
> +	struct device_node *i2c_node;
> +	struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ops = cfg->ops ?: &i2c_of_probe_dummy_ops;
> +	type = cfg->type;
> +
> +	i2c_node = i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(dev, type);


	struct device_node *i2c_node __free(of_node_put) =
		i2c_...;

> +	if (IS_ERR(i2c_node))
> +		return PTR_ERR(i2c_node);
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> +		if (!of_device_is_available(node))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Device tree has component already enabled. Either the
> +		 * device tree isn't supported or we already probed once.
> +		 */
> +		ret = 0;

Shouldn't you drop reference count for "node"? (See also below)

> +		goto out_put_i2c_node;
> +	}
> +
> +	i2c = of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node(i2c_node);
> +	if (!i2c) {
> +		ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "Couldn't get I2C adapter\n");
> +		goto out_put_i2c_node;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Grab resources */
> +	ret = 0;
> +	if (ops->get_resources)
> +		ret = ops->get_resources(dev, i2c_node, ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_put_i2c_adapter;
> +
> +	/* Enable resources */
> +	if (ops->enable)
> +		ret = ops->enable(dev, ctx);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_release_resources;
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +	for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> +		union i2c_smbus_data data;
> +		u32 addr;
> +
> +		if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr))
> +			continue;
> +		if (i2c_smbus_xfer(i2c, addr, 0, I2C_SMBUS_READ, 0, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &data) < 0)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Found a device that is responding */
> +		if (ops->free_resources_early)
> +			ops->free_resources_early(ctx);
> +		ret = i2c_of_probe_enable_node(dev, node);

Hmm... Is "node" reference count left bumped up for a reason?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ops->cleanup)
> +		ops->cleanup(dev, ctx);
> +out_release_resources:
> +	if (ops->free_resources_late)
> +		ops->free_resources_late(ctx);
> +out_put_i2c_adapter:
> +	i2c_put_adapter(i2c);
> +out_put_i2c_node:
> +	of_node_put(i2c_node);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

...

> +/*
> + * i2c-of-prober.h - definitions for the Linux I2C OF component prober

Please avoid putting filenames inside files. In the possible future event of
file renaming this may become a burden and sometimes even forgotten.

> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Google LLC
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H
> +#define _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H

> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC)

Do you really need to hide data types with this? Wouldn't be enough to hide
APIs only?

> +struct device;
> +struct device_node;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_of_probe_ops - I2C OF component prober callbacks
> + *
> + * A set of callbacks to be used by i2c_of_probe_component().
> + *
> + * All callbacks are optional. Callbacks are called only once per run, and are
> + * used in the order they are defined in this structure.
> + *
> + * All callbacks that have return values shall return %0 on success,
> + * or a negative error number on failure.
> + *
> + * The @dev parameter passed to the callbacks is the same as @dev passed to
> + * i2c_of_probe_component(). It should only be used for dev_printk() calls
> + * and nothing else, especially not managed device resource (devres) APIs.
> + */
> +struct i2c_of_probe_ops {
> +	/** @get_resources: Retrieve resources for components. */
> +	int (*get_resources)(struct device *dev, struct device_node *bus_node, void *data);
> +
> +	/** @free_resources_early: Release exclusive resources prior to enabling component. */
> +	void (*free_resources_early)(void *data);
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @enable: Enable resources so that the components respond to probes.
> +	 *
> +	 * Resources should be reverted to their initial state before returning if this fails.
> +	 */
> +	int (*enable)(struct device *dev, void *data);
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @cleanup: Opposite of @enable to balance refcounts after probing.
> +	 *
> +	 * Can not operate on resources already freed in @free_resources_early.
> +	 */
> +	int (*cleanup)(struct device *dev, void *data);
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @free_resources_late: Release all resources, including those that would have
> +	 *                       been released by @free_resources_early.
> +	 */
> +	void (*free_resources_late)(void *data);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_of_probe_cfg - I2C OF component prober configuration
> + * @ops: Callbacks for the prober to use.
> + * @type: A string to match the device node name prefix to probe for.
> + */
> +struct i2c_of_probe_cfg {
> +	const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> +	const char *type;
> +};
> +
> +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx);
> +
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H */

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-13 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-11  7:27 [PATCH v7 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-12 20:31   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] regulator: Split up _regulator_get() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] regulator: Add of_regulator_get_optional() for pure DT regulator lookup Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] i2c: core: Remove extra space in Makefile Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 14:59   ` Andi Shyti
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:25   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-09-15 10:44     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 10:36       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-16 10:55         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-16 14:59         ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 15:22           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-15 11:32     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 14:15       ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-16 14:31         ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 10:13     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-15 10:09   ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] i2c: of-prober: Add simple helpers for regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 15:36   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support to simple helpers Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 10:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-17 12:41     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-23 19:11       ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-15  9:46   ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 14:24   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-13 15:36   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-13 23:43   ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-16 14:58     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-16 15:23       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-13 18:08 ` (subset) [PATCH v7 00/10] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZuQTFTNTBLCziD05@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.