All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@meta.com>,
	Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] perf/x86: Use user_unwind interface
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:01:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zun8VdrLmWwPsVnu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202409161428.3cc6c1e1-oliver.sang@intel.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:48:35PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed "kernel_BUG_at_kernel/unwind/user.c" on:
> 
> commit: 164c5ae4072303c9eb4e263115a5e70d5a3cc052 ("[PATCH v2 05/11] perf/x86: Use user_unwind interface")
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Josh-Poimboeuf/unwind-Introduce-generic-user-space-unwinding-interface/20240914-070619
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git perf-tools-next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/daf3f59e0d14ee11b45ad6735b8a211a3c7534dc.1726268190.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org/
> patch subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] perf/x86: Use user_unwind interface
> 
> in testcase: fsmark
> version: fsmark-x86_64-2628be5-1_20240224
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	iterations: 1x
> 	nr_threads: 64t
> 	disk: 1BRD_48G
> 	fs: xfs
> 	filesize: 4M
> 	test_size: 24G
> 	sync_method: NoSync
> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> 
> 
> 
> compiler: gcc-12
> test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8260L CPU @ 2.40GHz (Cascade Lake) with 128G memory
> 
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
> 
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409161428.3cc6c1e1-oliver.sang@intel.com
> 
> 
> [   53.036370][    C3] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   53.036374][    C3] kernel BUG at kernel/unwind/user.c:39!

I also noticed this and the following patch would fix it.

Thanks,
Namhyung


diff --git a/kernel/unwind/user.c b/kernel/unwind/user.c
index 3a7b14cf522b4139..3c8f1deb6d34ec37 100644
--- a/kernel/unwind/user.c
+++ b/kernel/unwind/user.c
@@ -80,8 +80,10 @@ int user_unwind_start(struct user_unwind_state *state,
 	case USER_UNWIND_TYPE_SFRAME:
 		if (!sframe_possible)
 			return -EINVAL;
+		state->type = type;
 		break;
 	case USER_UNWIND_TYPE_FP:
+		state->type = type;
 		break;
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-17 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-13 23:02 [PATCH v2 00/11] unwind, perf: sframe user space unwinding, deferred perf callchains Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] unwind: Introduce generic user space unwinding interface Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] unwind/x86: Add HAVE_USER_UNWIND Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-14 14:07   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-15 12:18   ` Dan Carpenter
2024-09-16 11:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-20  8:09     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] unwind: Introduce SFrame user space unwinding Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-14  7:40   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-14  8:12   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-14 11:23   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-01 18:20     ` Indu Bhagat
2024-10-01 18:36       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-02  8:18         ` Florian Weimer
2024-10-02 14:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-23 13:59   ` Jens Remus
2024-10-27 17:49     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] unwind/x86/64: Add HAVE_USER_UNWIND_SFRAME Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-14 16:25   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-15 12:20   ` Dan Carpenter
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] perf/x86: Use user_unwind interface Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-16  6:48   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-17 22:01     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() 'init_nr' argument Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() 'crosstask' argument Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] perf: Simplify get_perf_callchain() user logic Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] perf: Introduce deferred user callchains Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-14  8:22   ` kernel test robot
2024-09-17 22:07   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] perf/x86: Add HAVE_PERF_CALLCHAIN_DEFERRED Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-13 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] perf/x86: Enable SFrame unwinding for deferred user callchains Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-14 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] unwind, perf: sframe user space unwinding, deferred perf callchains Steven Rostedt
2024-09-15 11:11   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-15 11:38     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-09-16 14:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-16 15:39       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-16 18:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-16  0:15           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-16  0:33             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-17  0:37               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-16 22:46           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-09-17 21:58             ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-18  5:14               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-10-03  2:31         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-03  2:37           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-10-03 14:56             ` Steven Rostedt
2024-09-16 16:03       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-09-14 19:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-23 13:22 ` Jens Remus
2024-10-24  2:22   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-27 17:24   ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zun8VdrLmWwPsVnu@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jordalgo@meta.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.