From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:02:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuxnOjflMkxPrK17@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240918144343.2876184-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 08:13:39PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Pass the current pipe into enabled_joiner_pipes(), and let it figure out
> the proper bitmasks for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 58 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 1ce334f3a3ae..65119c26ec88 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3717,7 +3717,19 @@ static void enabled_ultrajoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> }
> }
>
> -static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +static enum pipe get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> +{
> + if ((secondary_pipes & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
> + return pipe;
> +
> + /* ignore everything above our pipe */
> + primary_pipes &= ~GENMASK(7, pipe);
> +
> + /* highest remaining bit should be our primary pipe */
> + return fls(primary_pipes) - 1;
I think this could now be simplified to something like:
{
primary_pipes &= GENMASK(pipe, 0);
return primary_pipes ? BIT(fls(primary_pipes) - 1) : 0;
}
And returning a bitmask like that would perhaps be easier
for enabled_joiner_pipes() to handle.
> +}
> +
> +static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
> u8 *primary_pipes, u8 *secondary_pipes)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&dev_priv->drm);
> @@ -3782,10 +3794,30 @@ static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes),
> secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
>
> - *primary_pipes = primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | primary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> - primary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> - *secondary_pipes = secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | secondary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> - secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> + *primary_pipes = 0;
> + *secondary_pipes = 0;
> +
> + if (ultrajoiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> + *primary_pipes = BIT(get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_ultrajoiner_pipes,
> + secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes));
> + *secondary_pipes = secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes &
> + expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (uncompressed_joiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> + *primary_pipes = BIT(get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe,
> + primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes,
> + secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes));
> + *secondary_pipes =
> + secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes &
> + expected_uncompjoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> + } else if (bigjoiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> + *primary_pipes = BIT(get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_bigjoiner_pipes,
> + secondary_bigjoiner_pipes));
> + *secondary_pipes = secondary_bigjoiner_pipes &
> + expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_bigjoiner_pipes);
> + }
>
> /* Joiner pipes should always be consecutive primary and secondary */
> drm_WARN(display->drm, *secondary_pipes != *primary_pipes << 1,
This would now have to be something like:
drm_WARN(expected_*_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes);
(wich I suppose manes it has to be done for each joiner type
separately.
> @@ -3793,18 +3825,6 @@ static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> *primary_pipes, *secondary_pipes);
> }
>
> -static enum pipe get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> -{
> - if ((secondary_pipes & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
> - return pipe;
> -
> - /* ignore everything above our pipe */
> - primary_pipes &= ~GENMASK(7, pipe);
> -
> - /* highest remaining bit should be our primary pipe */
> - return fls(primary_pipes) - 1;
> -}
> -
> static u8 get_joiner_secondary_pipes(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> {
> enum pipe primary_pipe, next_primary_pipe;
I think this guy could be nuked, and callers should just use the
bitmasks returned by enabled_joiner_pipes directly.
> @@ -3893,7 +3913,7 @@ static u8 hsw_enabled_transcoders(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
>
> /* joiner secondary -> consider the primary pipe's transcoder as well */
> - enabled_joiner_pipes(dev_priv, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> + enabled_joiner_pipes(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> if (secondary_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) {
> cpu_transcoder = (enum transcoder)
> get_joiner_primary_pipe(crtc->pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> @@ -4030,7 +4050,7 @@ static void intel_joiner_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> u8 primary_pipes, secondary_pipes;
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>
> - enabled_joiner_pipes(i915, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> + enabled_joiner_pipes(i915, pipe, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
>
> if (((primary_pipes | secondary_pipes) & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
> return;
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-19 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-18 14:43 [PATCH 00/15] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915/display: Enhance iterators for modeset en/disable Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes required Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915/display: Add debugfs support to avoid joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 15:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 18:02 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 18:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 18:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 14:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-19 18:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-18 15:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev9) Patchwork
2024-09-18 15:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-09-18 15:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-18 16:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Patchwork
2024-09-18 16:29 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-18 16:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-18 16:42 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-18 16:44 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-18 16:46 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-18 17:10 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-19 1:52 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-19 5:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev9) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuxnOjflMkxPrK17@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.