Re: Rust BoF and maintainer minutes and planning the roadmap to Rust

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 02:53:08AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:

> commitment by the Rust community is troubling. Even more troubling because
> rust still uses the old FreeBSD 11 compat syscalls, despite upgraded
> being available for years at this point (though maybe this info has changed
> in the last month or two, the years long delay in moving off the interfaces
> that the FreeBSD project obsoleted about 8 years ago is troubling on its
> own).

Is this problem resolved by this change updating to FreeBSD 12 ABI:

  https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/3434

Or is there more beyond that which remains an issue ?

Also what's the best source of truth about Rust support in FreeBSD 
eg I see this:

  https://wiki.freebsd.org/Rust

 Reports i386, amd64, armv6, armv7, aarch64, power64, power64le
 and riscv64

and then this

  https://www.freshports.org/lang/rust

but doesn't say anything about riscv64, and armv6/i386 is listed as
"N/A" for FreeBSD 15 - are those arches no longer supported in 15 ?

power64le is outdated there compared to other arches

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|