From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Xu Liu <liuxu@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: emulate avx vmovdq
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 05:57:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvAUIaZiFD3lsDI_@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240820230431.3850991-1-kbusch@meta.com>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, Keith Busch wrote:
> To test, I executed the following program against a qemu emulated pci
> device resource. Prior to this kernel patch, it would fail with
>
> traps: vmovdq[378] trap invalid opcode ip:4006b2 sp:7ffe2f5bb680 error:0 in vmovdq[6b2,400000+1000]
...
> +static const struct gprefix pfx_avx_0f_6f_0f_7f = {
> + N, I(Avx | Aligned, em_mov), N, I(Avx | Unaligned, em_mov),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct opcode avx_0f_table[256] = {
> + /* 0x00 - 0x5f */
> + X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N),
> + /* 0x60 - 0x6F */
> + X8(N), X4(N), X2(N), N,
> + GP(SrcMem | DstReg | ModRM | Mov, &pfx_avx_0f_6f_0f_7f),
> + /* 0x70 - 0x7F */
> + X8(N), X4(N), X2(N), N,
> + GP(SrcReg | DstMem | ModRM | Mov, &pfx_avx_0f_6f_0f_7f),
> + /* 0x80 - 0xFF */
> + X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N), X16(N),
> +};
Mostly as an FYI, we're likely going to run into more than just VMOVDQU sooner
rather than later. E.g. gcc-13 with -march=x86-64-v3 (which per Vitaly is now
the default gcc behavior for some distros[*]) compiles this chunk from KVM
selftests' kvm_fixup_exception():
regs->rip = regs->r11;
regs->r9 = regs->vector;
regs->r10 = regs->error_code;
intto this monstronsity (which is clever, but oof).
405313: c4 e1 f9 6e c8 vmovq %rax,%xmm1
405318: 48 89 68 08 mov %rbp,0x8(%rax)
40531c: 48 89 e8 mov %rbp,%rax
40531f: c4 c3 f1 22 c4 01 vpinsrq $0x1,%r12,%xmm1,%xmm0
405325: 49 89 6d 38 mov %rbp,0x38(%r13)
405329: c5 fa 7f 45 00 vmovdqu %xmm0,0x0(%rbp)
I wouldn't be surprised if the same packing shenanigans get employed when generating
code for a struct overlay of emulated MMIO.
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240920154422.2890096-1-vkuznets@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-22 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-20 23:04 [PATCH RFC] kvm: emulate avx vmovdq Keith Busch
2024-08-21 16:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-21 16:34 ` Keith Busch
2024-08-22 7:22 ` Tao Su
2024-08-22 14:39 ` Keith Busch
2024-08-23 3:47 ` Tao Su
2024-09-03 21:25 ` Keith Busch
2024-09-22 12:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-25 8:09 ` Keith Busch
2024-09-25 13:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-04 17:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvAUIaZiFD3lsDI_@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuxu@meta.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.