From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: show slave priority in proc info
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:37:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvIJ1xewGuJ_JhbE@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLoVexJpUbZzwAYtGpLiTZ36tFh5GpJU=mYH6YazJeTPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:45:23AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:29 AM Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The slave priority is currently not shown in the proc filesystem, which
> > prevents users from retrieving this information via proc. This patch fixes
> > the issue by printing the slave priority in the proc filesystem, making it
> > accessible to users.
> >
> > Fixes: 0a2ff7cc8ad4 ("Bonding: add per-port priority for failover re-selection")
> > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> > index 7edf72ec816a..8b8580956edd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static void bond_info_show_slave(struct seq_file *seq,
> > seq_printf(seq, "Permanent HW addr: %*phC\n",
> > slave->dev->addr_len, slave->perm_hwaddr);
> > seq_printf(seq, "Slave queue ID: %d\n", READ_ONCE(slave->queue_id));
> > + seq_printf(seq, "Slave prio: %d\n", READ_ONCE(slave->prio));
> >
> > if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> > const struct port *port = &SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port;
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >
>
> proc interface is deprecated in favor of rtnl.
>
> slave->prio is correctly reported in IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO attribute.
>
> No further kernel change is needed.
Thanks for the reply. Some users said they still prefer to use /proc
to get the bonding info as it's easier compared with get info via rtnl(ip
link). I'm OK to drop this patch.
Thanks
Hangbin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-23 7:28 [PATCH net] bonding: show slave priority in proc info Hangbin Liu
2024-09-23 7:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-24 0:37 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvIJ1xewGuJ_JhbE@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.