All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
	Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Ignore security failures in all PMU test
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:52:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvTojjciV9pFbGJi@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925173013.12789-1-irogers@google.com>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 10:30:13AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Refactor code to have some more error diagnosis on traps, etc. and to
> do less work on each line. Add an ignore situation for security failures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
> index d2a3506e0d19..42456d89c5da 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
> @@ -1,23 +1,51 @@
> -#!/bin/sh
> +#!/bin/bash
>  # perf all PMU test
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  
>  set -e
> +err=0
> +result=""
> +
> +trap_cleanup() {
> +  echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> +  echo "$result"
> +  exit 1
> +}
> +trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
>  
>  # Test all PMU events; however exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?')
> -for p in $(perf list --raw-dump pmu | sed 's/[[:graph:]]\+?[[:graph:]]\+[[:space:]]//g'); do
> +for p in $(perf list --raw-dump pmu | sed 's/[[:graph:]]\+?[[:graph:]]\+[[:space:]]//g')
> +do
>    echo "Testing $p"
>    result=$(perf stat -e "$p" true 2>&1)
> -  if ! echo "$result" | grep -q "$p" && ! echo "$result" | grep -q "<not supported>" ; then
> -    # We failed to see the event and it is supported. Possibly the workload was
> -    # too small so retry with something longer.
> -    result=$(perf stat -e "$p" perf bench internals synthesize 2>&1)
> -    if ! echo "$result" | grep -q "$p" ; then
> -      echo "Event '$p' not printed in:"
> -      echo "$result"
> -      exit 1
> -    fi
> +  if echo "$result" | grep -q "$p"
> +  then
> +    # Event seen in output.
> +    continue
> +  fi
> +  if echo "$result" | grep -q "<not supported>"
> +  then
> +    # Event not supported, so ignore.
> +    continue

I'm curious about this case.  It'll show up even if it's not supported
right?  Then the first condition would match and it doesn't reach here.

  $ perf stat -e LLC-loads true
  
   Performance counter stats for 'true':
  
     <not supported>      LLC-loads                                                             
  
         0.001213558 seconds time elapsed
  
         0.001373000 seconds user
         0.000000000 seconds sys

> +  fi
> +  if echo "$result" | grep -q "Access to performance monitoring and observability operations is limited."
> +  then
> +    # Access is limited, so ignore.
> +    continue
> +  fi
> +
> +  # We failed to see the event and it is supported. Possibly the workload was
> +  # too small so retry with something longer.

Ok, maybe we want to check "<not counted>" events specifically.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +  result=$(perf stat -e "$p" perf bench internals synthesize 2>&1)
> +  if echo "$result" | grep -q "$p"
> +  then
> +    # Event seen in output.
> +    continue
>    fi
> +  echo "Error: event '$p' not printed in:"
> +  echo "$result"
> +  err=1
>  done
>  
> -exit 0
> +trap - EXIT TERM INT
> +exit $err
> -- 
> 2.46.0.792.g87dc391469-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-26  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-25 17:30 [PATCH v1] perf test: Ignore security failures in all PMU test Ian Rogers
2024-09-26  4:52 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-09-26 15:24   ` Ian Rogers
2024-09-26 18:17     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-27 16:59 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZvTojjciV9pFbGJi@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.