From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
YangYang <yang.yang@vivo.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: also mark disk-owned queues as dying in __blk_mark_disk_dead
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:49:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zw-2Q1WeTtgJO_NI@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241016123240.GB18219@lst.de>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 07:09:48PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Setting QUEUE_FLAG_DYING may fail passthrough request for
> > !GD_OWNS_QUEUE, I guess this may cause SCSI regression.
>
> Yes, as clearly documented in the commit log.
The change need Cc linux-scsi.
> As the disk is going away there is no real point in sending these
> commands, but we have no really good way to distinguish between the
> cases.
scsi request queue has very different lifetime with gendisk, not sure the
above comment is correct.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 11:38 try to avoid del_gendisk vs passthrough from ->release deadlocks v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: also mark disk-owned queues as dying in __blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 12:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 12:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 13:49 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-16 4:14 ` YangYang
2024-10-16 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-16 12:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16 12:49 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-10-16 13:35 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 1:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 12:32 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 12:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 12:50 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 12:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 13:09 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 13:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 15:03 ` Ming Lei
2024-10-19 15:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-19 15:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-28 5:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: mark the disk dead before taking open_mutx in del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16 4:15 ` YangYang
2024-10-16 2:09 ` try to avoid del_gendisk vs passthrough from ->release deadlocks v2 Sergey Senozhatsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-08 11:57 RFC: try to avoid del_gendisk vs passthrough from ->release deadlocks Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: also mark disk-owned queues as dying in __blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 5:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-10-09 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zw-2Q1WeTtgJO_NI@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=yang.yang@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.