All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	lizhe.67@bytedance.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	will@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] rwsem: introduce upgrade_read interface
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:21:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zw-vrAFdO5aZKSmy@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zw-ou7gsqTMGQDdl@casper.infradead.org>

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:51:23PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > It's obviously a try_upgrade_read, right?
> 
> Well, that's confusing.  "try" usually means "don't sleep", and this
> sleeps.  Maybe it shouldn't sleep; ie we make this fail if there's any
> other reader?  It'll succeed less often, but it'll be easier to
> understand.

To me try primarily implies that it can fail and the return value
needs to be checked.  But I guess it has different implications to
different people.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-16 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-16  4:35 [RFC 0/2] rwsem: introduce upgrade_read interface lizhe.67
2024-10-16  4:35 ` [RFC 1/2] " lizhe.67
2024-10-16  4:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16  7:33     ` lizhe.67
2024-10-16  7:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16  8:00         ` lizhe.67
2024-10-16  8:03           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-16  8:13             ` lizhe.67
2024-10-16 11:51     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-16 12:21       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-16 11:49   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-17  6:23     ` lizhe.67
2024-10-16 14:23   ` Waiman Long
2024-10-16 18:05     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-16 18:39       ` Waiman Long
2024-10-17  6:46     ` lizhe.67
2024-10-17 15:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-17 17:36       ` Waiman Long
2024-10-18  5:06         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-19 22:59   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-16  4:36 ` [RFC 2/2] khugepaged: use upgrade_read() to optimize collapse_huge_page lizhe.67
2024-10-16 11:53   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-17  6:18     ` lizhe.67
2024-10-17 13:20       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-18  6:37         ` lizhe.67
2024-10-23  7:27   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-16  8:09 ` [RFC 0/2] rwsem: introduce upgrade_read interface Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-16  8:53   ` lizhe.67
2024-10-16 12:10     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zw-vrAFdO5aZKSmy@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.