Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] pinctrl: Add driver for the T-Head TH1520 SoC

[Drew Fustini <dfustini@tenstorrent.com>]

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 06:54:48PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Drew-Fustini/dt-bindings-pinctrl-Add-thead-th1520-pinctrl-bindings/20241001-035421
> base:   9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240930-th1520-pinctrl-v3-2-32cea2bdbecb%40tenstorrent.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] pinctrl: Add driver for the T-Head TH1520 SoC
> config: s390-randconfig-r072-20241002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410022336.xyWlV0Tf-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202410022336.xyWlV0Tf-lkp@intel.com/

I put these tags in the patch I'm about to send but I get this
checkpatch warning:

-----------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
#9:
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 7 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit 8d7cdbc31c9f ("pinctrl: th1520: Fix return value for unknown pin error") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
-----------------------------------------------------------

If I remove the first Reported-by, then checkpatch no longer complains.

Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Drew