All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
	xieyongji@bytedance.com, chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>,
	Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors in the physical package
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:55:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwSfFNUYQNs/X74u@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007081344.10907-1-xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>

Hi Chuang.

Look fine for me, and only some minor nits:

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 04:13:44PM +0800, Chuang Xu wrote:
> Date: Mon,  7 Oct 2024 16:13:44 +0800
> From: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical
>  processors in the physical package
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
> 
> When QEMU is started with:
> -cpu host,migratable=on,host-cache-info=on,l3-cache=off
> -smp 180,sockets=2,dies=1,cores=45,threads=2
> 
> Try to execute "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in guest, we'll obtain a value of 90 for
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], while the expected value is 128. And Try to
> execute "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in guest, we'll obtain a value of 63 for
> CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26] as expected.

I polished the sentences a bit:

When executing "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in the guest, we obtain a value of 90 for
CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], whereas the expected value is 128. Additionally,
executing "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in the guest yields a value of 63 for
CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26], which matches the expected result.

> As (1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) round up to the nearest power-of-2 integer,

s/round/rounds/

> we'd beter round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2
> integer too. Otherwise we may encounter unexpected results in guest.
> 
> For example, when QEMU is started with CLI above and xtopology is disabled,

What's xtopology?

> guest kernel 5.15.120 uses CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16]/(1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) to
> calculate threads-per-core in detect_ht(). Then guest will get "90/(1+63)=1"
> as the result, even though theads-per-core should actually be 2.

s/theads-per-core/threads-per-core/
 
> So let us round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2 integer
> to solve the unexpected result.
> 
> In addition, we introduce max_thread_number_in_package() instead of
> using pow2ceil() to be compatible with smp and hybrid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 85ef7452c0..1b4e3b6931 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,12 @@ static uint32_t max_thread_ids_for_cache(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
>      return num_ids - 1;
>  }
>  
> +static uint32_t max_thread_number_in_package(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
> +{
> +    uint32_t num_threads = 1 << apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info);
> +    return num_threads;
> +}
> +
>  static uint32_t max_core_ids_in_package(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
>  {
>      uint32_t num_cores = 1 << (apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info) -
> @@ -6462,7 +6468,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
>          }
>          *edx = env->features[FEAT_1_EDX];
>          if (threads_per_pkg > 1) {
> -            *ebx |= threads_per_pkg << 16;
> +            *ebx |= max_thread_number_in_package(&topo_info) << 16;

This helper has only 1 caller and its name doesn't distinguish the
addressable ID, so it's not necessary. I feel it's better to shift
the bits directly here:

*ebx |= 1 << apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info) << 16;

>              *edx |= CPUID_HT;
>          }
>          if (!cpu->enable_pmu) {
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07  8:13 [PATCH v4] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors in the physical package Chuang Xu
2024-10-07 12:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-10-08  2:31   ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-08  2:55 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-08 13:21   ` Chuang Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwSfFNUYQNs/X74u@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=weiguixiong@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yinyipeng@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.