Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dmaengine: Replace dma_request_slave_channel() by dma_request_chan()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:52:21AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 06:06:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> >  	 * Please note in any other slave case, you have to setup chan->private
> >  	 * with 'struct imx_dma_data' in your own filter function if you want to
> > -	 * request dma channel by dma_request_channel() rather than
> > -	 * dma_request_slave_channel(). Othwise, 'MEMCPY in case?' will appear
> > -	 * to warn you to correct your filter function.
> > +	 * request DMA channel by dma_request_channel(), otherwise, 'MEMCPY in
> > +	 * case?' will appear to warn you to correct your filter function.
> 
> It just change comments, why combined with dmaengine.h change.

Because this comment is related to what is done below.

...

> >  	struct dma_chan *chan;
> >
> > -	chan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, name);
> > -	if (chan)
> > +	chan = dma_request_chan(dev, name);

Here is no more dma_request_slave_channel() calls as in the mentioned
comment.

> > +	if (!IS_ERR(chan))
> >  		return chan;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko