All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
	xieyongji@bytedance.com, chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>,
	Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors in the physical package
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:21:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwYE1XODTVjQ5YGO@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009035638.59330-1-xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>

On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:56:38AM +0800, Chuang Xu wrote:
> Date: Wed,  9 Oct 2024 11:56:38 +0800
> From: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v6] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical
>  processors in the physical package
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
> 
> When QEMU is started with:
> -cpu host,migratable=on,host-cache-info=on,l3-cache=off
> -smp 180,sockets=2,dies=1,cores=45,threads=2
> 
> On Intel platform:
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] is defined as "max number of addressable IDs for
> logical processors in the physical package".
> 
> When executing "cpuid -1 -l 1 -r" in the guest, we obtain a value of 90 for
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16], whereas the expected value is 128. Additionally,
> executing "cpuid -1 -l 4 -r" in the guest yields a value of 63 for
> CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26], which matches the expected result.
> 
> As (1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) rounds up to the nearest power-of-2 integer,
> we'd beter round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2
> integer too. Otherwise we may encounter unexpected results in guest.
> 
> For example, when QEMU is started with CLI above and xtopology is disabled,
> guest kernel 5.15.120 uses CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16]/(1+CPUID.04H.EAX[31:26]) to
> calculate threads-per-core in detect_ht(). Then guest will get "90/(1+63)=1"
> as the result, even though threads-per-core should actually be 2.
> 
> And on AMD platform:
> CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] is defined as "Logical processor count". Current
> result meets our expectation.
> 
> So let us round up CPUID.01H.EBX[23:16] to the nearest power-of-2 integer
> only for Intel platform to solve the unexpected result.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuang Xu <xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

This version is fine for me, thanks.

-Zhao



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09  3:56 [PATCH v6] i386/cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors in the physical package Chuang Xu
2024-10-09  4:21 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-12  7:13 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-12  8:10   ` Chuang Xu
2024-10-12  8:32     ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-12  8:56       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12  8:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-12  9:28   ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12  9:35   ` Chuang Xu
2024-10-14  0:36     ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-14  1:32       ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-14  3:36       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17  8:18         ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-10-17  9:03           ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-28 16:07             ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-03  7:33               ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-03 15:04                 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-03 15:35                   ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-03 15:29                 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-12-03  7:36 ` Zhao Liu
2024-12-03  7:29   ` Chuang Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwYE1XODTVjQ5YGO@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=weiguixiong@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=xuchuangxclwt@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yinyipeng@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.