All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Of clk_hw_unregister_fractional_divider
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:58:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwcmrWgoClYI2nUq@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27ac7ba804d260ca9e1397a17b9e8696.sboyd@kernel.org>

* Stephen Boyd (sboyd@kernel.org) wrote:
> Quoting Dr. David Alan Gilbert (2024-10-08 17:54:24)
> > Hi,
> >   One of my scripts noticed that clk_hw_unregister_fractional_divider
> > was unused and I was thinking of dead coding it, but thought it worth
> > asking whether it's actually a missing call to it.
> > 
> >   It was added in 2016 by:
> > 
> > commit 39b44cff4ad4af6d7abd9dd2acb288b005c26503
> > Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Date:   Sun Feb 7 00:15:09 2016 -0800
> > 
> >     clk: fractional-divider: Add hw based registration APIs
> >     
> > and I can see clk_hw_register_fractional_divider is called from
> > clk_register_fractional_divider.
> > 
> > Is that just consequence of them being system devices that never
> > get unregistered or something else?
> > 
> 
> I don't know what you mean by system devices.

I mean something that can't get unplugged/removed.

> The clk_hw prefixed functions and clk_hw based APIs should be used
> instead of struct clk APIs for clk providers in general. I'd accept a
> patch that migrates the two calls to clk_register_fractional_divider()
> with a call to clk_hw_register_fractional_divider() instead. If that's
> done we can remove clk_register_fractional_divider(), which is the
> overall plan but nobody got around to it so far.

Oh hmm, that doesn't look too hard for those two - although I'm not sure
I have a way of testing it?

However, my question was about the clk_hw_*un*register_fractional_divider
- I can see the clk_register_fractional_divider can be replaced by
clk_hw_register_fractional_divider - but would there need to be
a call to the unregister somewhere? (Which is what my script noticed
there's no callers of).

Dave

-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09  0:54 Of clk_hw_unregister_fractional_divider Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-10-09 20:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-10-10  0:58   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2024-10-10  1:23     ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwcmrWgoClYI2nUq@gallifrey \
    --to=linux@treblig.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.