From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE150209F47 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728631392; cv=none; b=grFL/cIfijDXbtC1vuZyiZ+C/0Vt26nUkKshQqO3poSiCCTY9QHxIAKoYtLo3alHO385jOXYvb85emV1SxqixdqI/G09YwAAvKeJF/xv3EFnzzKlYHfcYKLLKVl0OXzgNtDxFSgIAAXoAFwCWEH/jPGE3+ZhxI7/+jwtoDp7z2s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728631392; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0l+HP1wG7FlvFZBwuf0WJ9dQ/kIrzFUT3ZGyVXRKHKY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t8BJWwANA1itbhr1RBDWv6hm4AoMx7P/XyYGt1KInnicbAcSseNNPqGO/FCJIIwPZR7dphqFYOr/VG3YAKGz6l/OdTSY4/iUsmXBxyBj/+Rbma50sZMM1xydlEkJq5oqxUWB9fBYSiEAaHHdGgLU8UIgekJxWq2aPPVEB73ozWQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ucw.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ucw.cz header.i=@ucw.cz header.b=H3otn10T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ucw.cz header.i=@ucw.cz header.b="H3otn10T" Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 864F31C0086; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:16:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucw.cz; s=gen1; t=1728631003; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Hj5S2Pv5E96aLb9HR/+YI6ws7noD0Ue/KgTdoCW+78U=; b=H3otn10TTh3YeZSemWzVCg/cL5nzPEThji4qk4gJiAvotcEaw6YvcXzNdpxiKHRvpKAIRh iWUD1riQSs/djnfUnyFjP+7b/z54ysyIiE8coZdujP9XA214Av9DSNjezC3YoyDTbyfYSm IRTlVG8rvFIiDqznwXxJsmxpl3Fsnqs= Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:16:43 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Lee Jones , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Switch back to struct platform_driver::remove() Message-ID: References: <20241010203622.839625-5-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H5q+UlmE7NprfSOa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241010203622.839625-5-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> --H5q+UlmE7NprfSOa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > After commit 0edb555a65d1 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove() > return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for > platform drivers. Would it make sense to wait few years with that? I feel this is going to cause problems with backports to stable... Best regards, Pavel --=20 People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates. --H5q+UlmE7NprfSOa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZwjQ2wAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8rXmAKCVf6G4aUd6b/r3JKOkT2fHDronBwCeLFySj1D54UONwI5yxRO+p/1ZX3Y= =AtFB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H5q+UlmE7NprfSOa--