From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
"Rae Moar" <rmoar@google.com>, "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
"Anil S Keshavamurthy" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Daniel Latypov" <dlatypov@google.com>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Fangrui Song" <maskray@google.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:57:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwkuvKogPuik90fN@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW=MF0H8YVuY6moLomTaxFEeCHgut1fruRGEkn79sbuTA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:38:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:44 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:25:07PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > > From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Following from the recent KUnit file naming discussion[1], move all
> > > KUnit tests in lib/ into lib/tests/.
> > >
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240720165441.it.320-kees@kernel.org/ [1]
> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> > > Acked-by: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > > Acked-by: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > > [Rebased onto mm-nonmm-unstable, moved usercopy_kunit]
> > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> >
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/bitfield_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/checksum_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/cmdline_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/cpumask_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/fortify_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/hashtable_test.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/is_signed_type_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/kunit_iov_iter.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/list-test.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/memcpy_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/overflow_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/siphash_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/slub_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/stackinit_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/string_helpers_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/string_kunit.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_bits.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_fprobe.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_hash.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_kprobes.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_linear_ranges.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_list_sort.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_sort.c (100%)
> > > rename lib/{ => tests}/usercopy_kunit.c (100%)
> >
> > While I support the idea, I think this adds an additional churn in creating a
> > duplicate 'test' in the filenames. Why they all can't be cut while removing?
> > (at least this question is not answered in the commit message)
>
> To avoid duplicate *.ko file names?
With what? Sorry, but I don't see how it's a problem. These are test cases.
Do they use kernel command line parameters? If so, shouldn't KUnit take care
about it in a more proper way?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 7:25 [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir David Gow
2024-10-11 8:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-06 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-06 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-07 7:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-09 9:39 ` David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] lib/math: Add int_log test suite David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory David Gow
2024-10-11 9:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-11 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 13:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-11 13:57 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-10-11 14:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-11 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 16:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-10-11 17:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-11 17:20 ` Kees Cook
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] lib/tests/kfifo_kunit.c: add tests for the kfifo structure David Gow
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] unicode: kunit: refactor selftest to kunit tests David Gow
2024-10-15 13:20 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-10-11 7:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] unicode: kunit: change tests filename and path David Gow
2024-10-15 13:21 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-10-11 13:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] KUnit test moves / renames Shuah Khan
2025-02-08 21:14 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAKRRn-cFvCOay-J6BEsGjcB309_k-4rr9u=yKU7BCmiW-OcVcA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-09 23:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-15 5:04 [PATCH 3/6] lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwkuvKogPuik90fN@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=rmoar@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.