From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com,
broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jeffxu@chromium.org,
joey.gouly@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: signal: Remove unused macro
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:44:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxZa13heTXFwiQXM@e133380.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7793ba63-1d3c-44b0-8daf-10c4a7b79bc9@arm.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 17/10/2024 17:49, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> >> Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal
> >> frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has
> >> apparently never been used.
> > Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does?
> >
> > Same throughout the series.
> >
> > (Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's
> > part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying...
> > and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take
> > the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.)
>
> Ah good point, I didn't consider that. Will make it explicit in patch 1
> and 2.
Thanks.
(I have a patch for submitting-patches.rst knocking about to propose
making this more explicit, but I didn't dare to post it so far...)
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 13:39 [PATCH 0/5] Improve arm64 pkeys handling in signal delivery Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-17 13:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: signal: Remove unused macro Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-17 15:49 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-21 10:05 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-21 13:44 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2024-10-21 13:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-17 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: signal: Remove unnecessary check when saving POE state Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-17 13:52 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-17 15:49 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-21 13:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-17 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: signal: Improve POR_EL0 handling to avoid uaccess failures Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-17 15:53 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-21 10:06 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-21 13:43 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-22 12:34 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-22 12:38 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-21 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-17 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/mm: Use generic pkey register manipulation Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-17 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/mm: Enable pkey_sighandler_tests on arm64 Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-17 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] Improve arm64 pkeys handling in signal delivery Dave Martin
2024-10-21 10:06 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-10-21 13:31 ` Dave Martin
2024-10-21 15:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-21 17:19 ` Will Deacon
2024-10-22 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-22 9:31 ` Pierre Langlois
2024-10-22 10:40 ` Stephen Röttger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxZa13heTXFwiQXM@e133380.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.