From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:59:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxdpicVgg8F3beow@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxD6cVFajwBlC9eN@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi netdev maintainers,
I see patchwork has failed again. It claims this series does not have a
cover letter, but it does, and lore has it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZxD6cVFajwBlC9eN@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
vs
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/E1t1P3X-000EJx-ES@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/
I guess the kernel.org infrastructure has failed in some way to deliver
the cover message to patchwork.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:52:17PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found yet more potential for cleanups in the XPCS driver.
>
> The first patch switches to using generic register definitions.
>
> Next, there's an overly complex bit of code in xpcs_link_up_1000basex()
> which can be simplified down to a simple if() statement.
>
> Then, rearrange xpcs_link_up_1000basex() to separate out the warnings
> from the functional bit.
>
> Next, realising that the functional bit is just the helper function we
> already have and are using in the SGMII version of this function,
> switch over to that.
>
> We can now see that xpcs_link_up_1000basex() and xpcs_link_up_sgmii()
> are basically functionally identical except for the warnings, so merge
> the two functions.
>
> Next, xpcs_config_usxgmii() seems misnamed, so rename it to follow the
> established pattern.
>
> Lastly, "return foo();" where foo is a void function and the function
> being returned from is also void is a weird programming pattern.
> Replace this with something more conventional.
>
> With these changes, we see yet another reduction in the amount of
> code in this driver.
>
> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h | 12 ----
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 11:52 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: pcs: xpcs: use generic register definitions Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: pcs: xpcs: remove switch() in xpcs_link_up_1000basex() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: pcs: xpcs: rearrange xpcs_link_up_1000basex() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: pcs: xpcs: replace open-coded mii_bmcr_encode_fixed() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: pcs: xpcs: combine xpcs_link_up_{1000basex,sgmii}() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: pcs: xpcs: rename xpcs_config_usxgmii() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net: pcs: xpcs: remove return statements in void function Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-21 11:08 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups Serge Semin
2024-10-22 21:42 ` Serge Semin
2024-10-22 8:59 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-10-22 9:23 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-22 9:30 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 11:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 11:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-28 21:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-23 14:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxdpicVgg8F3beow@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.