From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc (orbyte.nwl.cc [151.80.46.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3E21A00D6 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=151.80.46.58 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729608939; cv=none; b=k8xkGb5heYni+ZXblkuVdSXr2g67ZjU49+k7dby3AL6Y0LPSHewq7G+Jp6yGTpaF+vEyrEi+ggQi2QT71FH4Q+v7iwWMl7izj2yjxTHqMsCIuhf59FZwtzJbCi6sk+E6eTwl8a44jMdxLrhLbhun+w7vIxvV2CvdjIyvMfjQ3vg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729608939; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fZ10OF+uZvoBFfMfecd0oZnHvgBJ5o46gIvnEOnRHX4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=M3Swee2FHZBq1TFCV6gA9ZHS8bTd7PTB7/Yooe7k1t38JlN0MMn3J5k1gynm9EHKkMBHmZPeAcjFFJ2MVlAFWw3qWkAzziXdw4JdkcmweNhEt0IwEjAW4cLPO1MvfZzaWxC7w01dWacTubP7PKQZEriZGJcd0uAgmNS1j5IxC7s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nwl.cc; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nwl.cc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nwl.cc header.i=@nwl.cc header.b=ejOBMPMw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=151.80.46.58 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nwl.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nwl.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nwl.cc header.i=@nwl.cc header.b="ejOBMPMw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nwl.cc; s=mail2022; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YYdsK2Gmuw37hZGYEOk8kDaDtRBI0M7w5+ykEQab0Ns=; b=ejOBMPMwXA5ZWLDTuZKvBpCkIg PC3RBvkOpJRp8+MW7qJLL5M3X1Cjolua00u8wOpdCw8Hst9FOUfevkDYi1SNw9bmQF0JzYtnQHsU/ 4sEg7lav/uKcTyULO25t70JcoVNZ50/hOkpQEbrL46a9pW0ohlTDj5iGMlNj1Ny4cMv/o+cz+RfgP PJAw+t6EsaQcLOnlGijsrQK+nLhHOmibc8azGw06aBx/2EOC+rdxEVj4cI3VDLLFL568LL/1G4sub lclzZAbnTxs2ziWQcFP/FUcDKQkhqnOAY8qM3cfS0uTz/xV2L6mgqs9XCWZQ1bisffLpoHeQIYgp3 wxDWT3YA==; Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3GIH-000000000Yp-26OI; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:55:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:55:33 +0200 From: Phil Sutter To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables] tests: iptables-test: extend coverage for ip6tables Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de References: <20241020224707.69249-1-pablo@netfilter.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:30:58PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > [...] > > > - With your patch applied, 20 rules fail (in both variants). Is this > > > expected or a bug on my side? > > > > OK, so most failures are caused by my test kernel not having > > CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 enabled. > > > > Apart from that, there is a minor bug in introduced libip6t_recent.t in > > that it undoes commit d859b91e6f3ed ("extensions: recent: New kernels > > support 999 hits") by accident. More interesting though, it's reported > > twice, once for fast mode and once for normal mode. I'll see how I can > > turn off error reporting in fast mode, failing tests are repeated > > anyway. > > Would you point me to the relevant line in the libip6t_recent.t? It is in line 7, I had changed the supposed-to-fail --hitcount value of 999 to 65536. Cheers, Phil