From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [213.95.27.120])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4DCE19D8AD
	for <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:48:17 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1729604900; cv=none; b=W2VO/JHVXT5IHev0Sa7J+R+z1Y8e+Qc4GbxymrY/601JbIMQWTZnpsLaW0fYTsLkQY5UjglZdt4RT8MgVreXv4XOCini+WVLByjA89khR3vWZzFugMS1uJAFp81JKCLCQsZlI8zuQsfCUJiCSVrKvM9XOFC4MUJfR0o6JJJF8kg=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1729604900; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=JEm1QP9DmmwQQ1IuWdrFjoso7SbjNIO3X07fiM13VYQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lYw1/tCS1idXbem1cL/6H1io3zvFs/iEERtULXi7FZ3IdekVNkg8wEDcGh2lUKI59QLVjuxd2GGTsPKUclLJkStN1Zll57z9vTpJHcfBdQIomhw9ExedgliY3+a4KywZAuEeGDaom/dQTH/J5cU5jMX/sLf64508qO2QbpbOC4Q=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org
Received: from [78.30.37.63] (port=58722 helo=gnumonks.org)
	by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pablo@gnumonks.org>)
	id 1t3FF7-00DsZ3-Iy; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:48:15 +0200
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:48:12 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables] tests: iptables-test: extend coverage for
 ip6tables
Message-ID: <ZxetHFXRj08Jipu0@calendula>
References: <20241020224707.69249-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
 <ZxebAVfZ_aDSNeb4@orbyte.nwl.cc>
 <ZxejsR2ph2CSnYjD@orbyte.nwl.cc>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netfilter-devel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netfilter-devel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZxejsR2ph2CSnYjD@orbyte.nwl.cc>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:30:58PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> [...]
> > - With your patch applied, 20 rules fail (in both variants). Is this
> >   expected or a bug on my side?
> 
> OK, so most failures are caused by my test kernel not having
> CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 enabled.
> 
> Apart from that, there is a minor bug in introduced libip6t_recent.t in
> that it undoes commit d859b91e6f3ed ("extensions: recent: New kernels
> support 999 hits") by accident. More interesting though, it's reported
> twice, once for fast mode and once for normal mode. I'll see how I can
> turn off error reporting in fast mode, failing tests are repeated
> anyway.

Would you point me to the relevant line in the libip6t_recent.t?

Thanks.