All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: workqueue lockup debug
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:11:18 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyBgZr94Y9+xey4b@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70cb224f-a468-40a0-82c7-735c590bdb43@oracle.com>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 04:49:40PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> Hi workqueue and scheduler maintainers,
> 
> As reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/df9db1ce-17d9-49f1-ab6d-7ed9a4f1f9c0@oracle.com/T/#m506b9edb1340cdddd87c6d14d20222ca8d7e8796,
> I am experiencing a workqueue lockup for v6.12-rcX.
> 
> At the point it occurs, the system becomes unresponsive and I cannot bring
> it back to life.
> 
> Enabling /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace does not give
> anything extra in the way of debug. All I get is something like this:
> 
> Message from syslogd@jgarry-atomic-write-exp-e4-8-instance-20231214-1221 at
> Oct 24 15:34:02 ...
>  kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#29 stuck for 22s! [mysqld:14352]
> 
> Message from syslogd@jgarry-atomic-write-exp-e4-8-instance-20231214-1221 at
> Oct 24 15:34:02 ...
>  kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=4 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck
> for 30s!
> 
> Message from syslogd@jgarry-atomic-write-exp-e4-8-instance-20231214-1221 at
> Oct 24 15:34:02 ...
>  kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=31 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck
> for 49s!
> ^C
> 
> Can you advise on a robust method to get some debug from this system?
> 
> Maybe this is a scheduler issue, as Dave mentioned in that same thread.

I just got a new hit on the scheduler issue on 6.12-rc5:

[  172.477662] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  172.480660] se->on_rq
[  172.480682] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 728318 at kernel/sched/fair.c:5629 pick_task_fair+0xb6/0x1b0
[  172.487172] Modules linked in:
[  172.488911] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 728318 Comm: 291 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-dgc+ #273
[  172.492022] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[  172.496029] RIP: 0010:pick_task_fair+0xb6/0x1b0
[  172.497978] Code: 40 f3 f3 03 01 74 2a 41 80 7f 50 00 74 96 f6 05 31 f3 f3 03 01 75 8d c6 05 28 f3 f3 03 01 48 c7 c7 41 26 e4 82 e8 7a d7 fa ff <0f> 0b e9 73 ff ff ff c6 05 0d f3 f3 03 01 48 c7 c7 2f 26 e4 82 e8
[  172.505868] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002ec83d60 EFLAGS: 00010046
[  172.508111] RAX: bdcdd05ee831a400 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000027
[  172.511139] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffdfffff RDI: ffff88881fadc9c8
[  172.514326] RBP: ffffc9002ec83d88 R08: 00000000001fffff R09: ffff88a018a00000
[  172.517804] R10: 00000000005ffffd R11: 0000000000000004 R12: ffff888122b58c00
[  172.520788] R13: ffff88881faf0140 R14: ffff88881faf00c0 R15: ffff88819e8cd180
[  172.523748] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88881fac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  172.527167] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  172.529571] CR2: 00007f378e8866fc CR3: 000000104daae000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
[  172.532601] Call Trace:
[  172.533666]  <TASK>
[  172.534557]  ? show_regs+0x5e/0x70
[  172.535993]  ? __warn+0xd0/0x1d0
[  172.537430]  ? pick_task_fair+0xb6/0x1b0
[  172.539062]  ? report_bug+0x145/0x1f0
[  172.540619]  ? handle_bug+0x67/0x90
[  172.542060]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x50
[  172.543854]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
[  172.545688]  ? pick_task_fair+0xb6/0x1b0
[  172.547353]  pick_next_task_fair+0x27/0x330
[  172.549090]  __schedule+0x2ad/0xb10
[  172.550460]  do_task_dead+0x43/0x50
[  172.551743]  do_exit+0x836/0xab0
[  172.552950]  do_group_exit+0x8f/0x90
[  172.554274]  __x64_sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
[  172.555808]  x64_sys_call+0x2ed3/0x2ee0
[  172.557210]  do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130
[  172.558531]  ? exc_page_fault+0x62/0xc0
[  172.559907]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  172.561739] RIP: 0033:0x7f378e74b3c5
[  172.563036] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f378e74b39b.
[  172.565278] RSP: 002b:00007ffd21861488 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
[  172.568001] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f378e857fa8 RCX: 00007f378e74b3c5
[  172.570589] RDX: 00000000000000e7 RSI: ffffffffffffff88 RDI: 0000000000000000
[  172.573182] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffd21861428 R09: 00007ffd218613af
[  172.575758] R10: 00007ffd21861320 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007f378e856680
[  172.578356] R13: 00007f378e8b9f40 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007f378e857fc0
[  172.580941]  </TASK>

There was nothing particularly obvious that caused it. It's a 64p
VM, running a heavy concurrent fstests workload that takes about 20
minutes to complete. There are a bit over 8000 tasks reported, most
of them kernel threads. The load is consuming about 50 CPUs, 40GB of
RAM, sustaining ~3GB/s of IO to/from disk across about 130 block
devices and the scheduler is context switching around 800,000 times
a second.

I have no idea how to reproduce this on demand - it randomly shows
up in about 1 in every 10 test runs and all the tests running at
that point in time report failure because they all detect this
warning in dmesg.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-24 15:49 workqueue lockup debug John Garry
2024-10-24 18:56 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-25  9:28   ` John Garry
2024-10-29  4:11 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-10-29  8:07   ` John Garry
2024-10-29 15:51     ` John Garry
2024-11-07 12:39 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-11-07 22:57   ` Dave Chinner
2024-11-08  8:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-11 13:22       ` John Garry
2024-11-11 21:01       ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyBgZr94Y9+xey4b@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.