From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com (mail-qk1-f180.google.com [209.85.222.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A12261F4FA8 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 04:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730176943; cv=none; b=C3oZicDi6zkVDgRGfRqcl0dP9vrwOj5n6ZTloJyBKRM2OW8+c8xw4gWOYgUVBpLMLnwzp2udY75Uh7EOvov9q7088mr3BM9pTQu8Q8acWSjI5izVVAsM+BM0mdNjMERAO4GaHFsivqkn+1G2w/W4+qG0TuApjZD7/Zc9E/OiVjo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730176943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CiB8PdUxgE2SSWDDmPtzZYlJTn0oJ8d/Vqg4vuRgxGo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CcHkAy796sAWpvepmg+uroNg5wPln0+OLraHtfTXYLv5buJEkTqs1FGda8ezSRIq5Laq++RxzfidfMN/gUN7/CfieAbzSZL354ZVwMWoe9gXqntFvGRol8qzLuYH6AY9f7XJzfG/KEZkRxYvkqhUaq7mhrIlEKG6o/GrtldMsw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=IdZTrF+d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IdZTrF+d" Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7b13bf566c0so306439985a.3 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:42:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730176940; x=1730781740; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:feedback-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SCDuYnGCVDfYfMTEaNcdXNBa6KERcUJLKMaVLvH9fgM=; b=IdZTrF+dnTBRLKf3klR/23sp5YFWfWUj3NyJvIdxRzMoX+sYa4ENyalEZdYWoHttCo b7eLjwDWGBbOz6fUnmuSlt7tFnuOHIlGvgMeyLiOayxdvooM2ucBTnKvwMRDu2shXlIc 2SbipOK+jXnCGj14vDmwYq/r1jcq2X/+L+thb+o9fxf7AxoreqpxmiJPhWpKMvGOYGpU McruwFDxehlwtNj61dr4VrXxnXmfZNJIrJOl7I9/iudFMldeZpqADoQgnRL/3iVLlgNE Rf5iphejT8+RuDiwL4TbHCkjiSx59PWLonEiR+0N7JgBgxTWoW2WZEcWFRMV6M2Rw5mn 3mww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730176940; x=1730781740; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:feedback-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SCDuYnGCVDfYfMTEaNcdXNBa6KERcUJLKMaVLvH9fgM=; b=GLEFv9npsMQZIaD+pUFqvk/dBv1yuMS/htmvCQJ3uxfE8x3N/i534J9Vy4BRyPeK+6 PUqvntU+EwcwhvNOb1XfjPU9x6zs17bsdw41yzKplzGVqQuOEugmOwvLfVnfhzW4/Rxs Q9c8Mt6d7uIS1q2iHw7fj+kl/LssQdYLv+3Zbl7Q5VwjRdU4BBC6ERvFOtb7zUUWXo+W IcdcA0DhzWwB6mE++/s08ClHhdbg7ilU4uRn/Er8kdfjYj1wHrky63p4iayTcriWn0uG MRLw3YVDQOm3n4A13pyMM1w7AjzcKqJWKGo0cmAKdEylWCZceZ4BDlD2EHlq3DG6sLMt 5UMQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWMrLxtVLUCREc03oNN4JZdTeTWXM9y6j4kpfz6w7CN4QHMxvSUW3WP1OaBWgLwKV/V3uPOQnp3HRHtLr2F@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyVQ6ffC+pCNCQgVvEN+AZZsOREsR27LK4J2tkCYva7NkNPagFu Sth8ki1p4HNbEqxLEKZxUjwE+xVahiaNwuvnDUW9MtYMS8YHzf+Q X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH5Fuoo7UvhdyIn+/1zNRvGW32cGzgVo0mpYat+WhPhJk1+IO+WW4lGkFX1mNOHGQz1yEpL8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:448a:b0:6cb:f744:e3f1 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6d1856f193bmr175571186d6.4.1730176940324; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fauth-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fauth-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [103.168.172.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6d1798b195esm38890326d6.42.2024.10.28.21.42.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.phl.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A48D1200043; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:42:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:42:19 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdektddgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvden ucfhrhhomhepuehoqhhunhcuhfgvnhhguceosghoqhhunhdrfhgvnhhgsehgmhgrihhlrd gtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdeihfeigedtvdeuueffieetvedtgeejuefh hffgudfgfeeggfeftdeigeehvdenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghoqhhunhdo mhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqieelvdeghedtieegqddujeejke ehheehvddqsghoqhhunhdrfhgvnhhgpeepghhmrghilhdrtghomhesfhhigihmvgdrnhgr mhgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhope hlkhhpsehinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprghlihgtvghrhihhlhesghhoohhg lhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepohgvqdhksghuihhlugdqrghllheslhhishhtshdrlh hinhhugidruggvvhdprhgtphhtthhopegsohhquhhnsehfihigmhgvrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iad51458e:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:42:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:41:17 -0700 From: Boqun Feng To: kernel test robot Cc: Alice Ryhl , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [boqun:lockdep-for-tip 5/5] error[E0599]: no method named `try_lock` found for struct `Lock` in the current scope Message-ID: References: <202410291211.4JnU6G41-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202410291211.4JnU6G41-lkp@intel.com> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 12:22:05PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: [...] > >> error[E0599]: no method named `try_lock` found for struct `Lock` in the current scope > --> rust/kernel/sync/lock/global.rs:90:31 > | > 90 | inner: self.inner.try_lock()?, > | ^^^^^^^^ > | > ::: rust/kernel/init/macros.rs:822:9 > | > 822 | / $vis struct $name <$($decl_generics)*> > 823 | | where $($whr)* > 824 | | { > 825 | | $($fields)* > 826 | | } > | |_________- method `try_lock` not found for this struct > | > help: there is a method `lock` with a similar name > | > 90 | inner: self.inner.lock()?, > | ~~~~ > Ok, I should have noticed this one depends on try_lock(), but it won't be a problem since I plan to rebase on v6.13-rc1. Regards, Boqun > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki