All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: vmolnaro@redhat.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com, acme@redhat.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: perf sched timehist --state vs perf script
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:34:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024163630.24882-1-vmolnaro@redhat.com>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:36:30PM +0200, vmolnaro@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
> 
> Hello!
> 
> We encountered an issue with 'perf sched timehist --state' when
> we expected for a test case that the process of a workload would 
> eventually end in the dead state(marked by 'X') and be switched
> out. This can be seen also by using 'perf script':
> 
>     # perf sched record -a sleep 1
>     [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>     [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.167 MB perf.data (166 samples) ]
>     # perf script | grep sleep
>            sleep  151541 [000] 193461.410617: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=3132275 [ns]
>            sleep  151541 [000] 193461.410624:       sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] S ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
>          swapper       0 [000] 193462.410688:       sched:sched_waking: comm=sleep pid=151541 prio=120 target_cpu=000
>          swapper       0 [000] 193462.410698:       sched:sched_switch: swapper/0:0 [120] R ==> sleep:151541 [120]
>          :151541  151541 [000] 193462.411100: sched:sched_stat_runtime: comm=sleep pid=151541 runtime=407210 [ns]
>          :151541  151541 [000] 193462.411107:       sched:sched_switch: sleep:151541 [120] X ==> swapper/0:0 [120]
> 
> But for the 'perf sched timehist --state' the process is shown
> in the zombie state when it is being switched out:
> 
>     # perf sched timehist --state | grep 151541
>     Samples do not have callchains.
>       193461.410624 [0000]  sleep[151541]                       0.000      0.054      3.129      S 
>       193462.411107 [0000]  :151541[151541]                     0.000      0.000      0.408      Z 
> 
> Shouldn't both commands report the same result, or is there a reason
> why 'perf script' uses the dead state while 'perf sched' uses dead?

I remember there was a discussion related to this.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122070859.1394479-2-zegao@tencent.com/

And it seems it's fixed both in perf and libtraceevent.  Maybe your
libtraceevent is somewhat outdated and doesn't have the update.

> It also seems that the 'perf sched' cannot read the name of the zombie
> process, but that can be a different issue.

Hmm.. right.  It should update thread->comm using the sched_switch event.

Thanks,
Namhyung


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-30  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-24 16:36 perf sched timehist --state vs perf script vmolnaro
2024-10-30  0:34 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-10-31 11:32   ` Michael Petlan
2024-11-02  6:20     ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyF_JDYF4wgEmbrW@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.