From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/1] cpufreq: scmi: Register for limit change notifications
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 09:32:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyH9HvKmYjlJC8_x@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603192654.2167620-2-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 12:56:54AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Register for limit change notifications if supported and use the throttled
> frequency from the notification to apply HW pressure.
>
This sort of got lost in mbox...apologies.
As discussed offlist, the issue with cpufreq and multiple SCMI instances
remains BUT it will be solved later on with a different approach, so
as of now this LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Thanks,
Cristian
P.S.: have you got any chance to try the hack/experimental patch I CCed
you to address the multi/instance cpufreq issues ? (just to understand
if it is a viable option...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 19:26 [PATCH V5 0/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Register and handle limits change notification Sibi Sankar
2024-06-03 19:26 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-06-03 19:26 ` [PATCH V5 1/1] cpufreq: scmi: Register for limit change notifications Sibi Sankar
2024-06-03 19:26 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-10-16 23:45 ` Mike Tipton
2024-10-30 9:32 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2024-10-30 9:55 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyH9HvKmYjlJC8_x@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.