From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A7FD132BE for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F53D0ADA for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:05:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B463C130D for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:05:14 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F118661F8F3 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:05:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3907021B79; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:05:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1730725510; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+A4fGt9jgrbs+Y2L4kMhTvQar2frUXEtw+M/nxCPvAA=; b=cajqlp4qKxVkXbIkMbbBo81MqLKaYnMu28QxWdXRApsGauOOmNfbAtilm0Jd0jjAuCKNV1 8S2BvRXTJlugz2EQ0ZpRhfdNdk/SDhRiHUXO8t9+nWnguuAGMvNdU6g5XoOznI2tmzBqAI skJkgAGrvpJlJXximJWt5dDVSmd/JLA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1730725510; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+A4fGt9jgrbs+Y2L4kMhTvQar2frUXEtw+M/nxCPvAA=; b=6aZc7LduaXAbV4EjkQgiaY5eOMEvkRBfXc8VS8QrRNJU5EBoZ5KmRbIMb0o2fK2XV7nDEo 9dIs2OOCIbvNJfCQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1730725510; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+A4fGt9jgrbs+Y2L4kMhTvQar2frUXEtw+M/nxCPvAA=; b=cajqlp4qKxVkXbIkMbbBo81MqLKaYnMu28QxWdXRApsGauOOmNfbAtilm0Jd0jjAuCKNV1 8S2BvRXTJlugz2EQ0ZpRhfdNdk/SDhRiHUXO8t9+nWnguuAGMvNdU6g5XoOznI2tmzBqAI skJkgAGrvpJlJXximJWt5dDVSmd/JLA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1730725510; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+A4fGt9jgrbs+Y2L4kMhTvQar2frUXEtw+M/nxCPvAA=; b=6aZc7LduaXAbV4EjkQgiaY5eOMEvkRBfXc8VS8QrRNJU5EBoZ5KmRbIMb0o2fK2XV7nDEo 9dIs2OOCIbvNJfCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2759313736; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 7vv4B4bGKGfTYwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:05:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:05:13 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20241101141111.104803-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20241101141111.104803-6-mdoucha@suse.cz> <20241101233221.GC1324664@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241101233221.GC1324664@pevik> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 5/5] Add test for data integrity over NFS X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Test timed out, sending SIGTERM! > If you are running on slow machine, try exporting LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL > 1 > Sending SIGKILL to test process... > Test is still running... 10 > Test is still running... 9 > Test is still running... 8 > Test is still running... 7 > Test is still running... 6 > Test is still running... 5 > Test is still running... 4 > Test is still running... 3 > Test is still running... 2 > Test is still running... 1 > Test is still running, sending SIGKILL > Killed Isn't the propblem here that the fsplough.c itself does not have .max_runtime set? I think that main problem here is that we have a LTP test that is being executed from another LTP test which means that we have two layers of everything including timeouts. > The quickest way would be to use the same calculation (* $TST_CNT + 5% for spare > time) in nfs10.sh and increase tst_set_timeout with. > > Or, I wonder if using tst_loader.sh and tst_run_shell.c would help to integrate > these. But I'm not sure how easily could be nfs_lib.sh integrated, e.g. > * isn't it too late, when it uses tst_net.sh (maybe this file would need to be > integrated) > * should use keep using TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1 from tst_test.sh or configure > via all_filesystems=1 via json? I guess that the best solution would be to add NFS support into the tst_test.c as another filesystem. That way we would get much more coverate than we do now. I guess that it would be doable as long as the configuration on how to do that is passed to the test library somehow. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp