From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A0421BAEDC for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730725895; cv=none; b=OdAZnf4rdiSB4ZofntuOXpKnBNWy+xCmwvS94Rtx7A9l0nAcucSP2z0mDX+V4i7VANXau0QUmE1DHbovdwN01KKijoc4kBJ5GtEG3mpM98K5qCVTaHBsRfP7FR3yDtuuD3vKXgkc/HRXRySYbSVqi0m/jByDd8OOM9vhKyhRsC0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730725895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1lGdbN0LAG1e6Q5c4FNRN5slOOXeZ+qLxVNUBjrRd+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=R5aRwV9yheH8MpdJew0K0AbQj1kYoeTFWeuxvNsxyLzj9Oi7gHfFxPrplFu9RUqsJHo4A4xO9bxb0moUWWqahuXaSzX0Ikps1cYuGndjVBoUJ3xDq4rrVyGY9aTkId+12ZiVGLRWOPzvi32GmbmWwcL9nChMHG8KLIuROYuqZYk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hIUIIksESoCKsfRmHl+4Sw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: O0hgGyyXT3qjFXBUS3TnrA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="30273960" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30273960" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 05:11:34 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZKnO8cPmTneh6IoeZNVc0Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9Z4hWyMjRiehbgR7F0LdHw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,257,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="114437929" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 05:11:29 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1t7wrc-0000000B4X5-32BK; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 15:11:24 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:11:24 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hans de Goede Cc: Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Jeff Johnson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jonathan Bergh , Roshan Khatri , Dipendra Khadka , Sergio de Almeida Cipriano Junior , Kent Overstreet , Kartik Kulkarni , Kathara Sasikumar , Tchadel Icard , Kate Hsuan , Colin Ian King , Lorenzo Stoakes , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] media: atomisp: Remove License information boilerplate Message-ID: References: <20240923105539.3569110-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <28958f62-9051-45a6-a26d-585508e2bd11@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:51:40PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 4-Nov-24 1:30 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 1:57 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On 23-Sep-24 12:53 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> We have the respective SPDX identifiers that are already being applied > >>> to the files in question. Remove the License information boilerplate. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > >> > >> Thank you for your patch(es). > > > > Thank you! > > > > There is one patch (marked rft) left in the queue. Can you, please, > > apply it locally to your branches which you use to test AtomISP with? > > I'm talking about 20240923085652.3457117-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com. > > Yes I noticed that one myself too. But atm I'm at the co-working and > I wanted to get the pull-req for 6.13 out the door (it already is > a bit late and I hope it will still make it). It's fine that change needs to be tested, better more than less testing. > I have just added this to my personal repo and I'll try to give it > a test spin soon. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko