All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Prasad Pandit <ppandit@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
	Prasad Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] migration/postcopy: magic value for postcopy channel
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:18:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZykB3voFw_-ByWfh@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8KmOyzWRqpGDOyAK7V2X8+SWVt_kR1897tiFm7vdBNRRE2QA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:02:33PM +0530, Prasad Pandit wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 20:04, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > As we discussed internally, we can't do this unconditionally.  We at least
> > some compat properties.
> 
> * ie. we define a new compat property to check if postcopy sends a
> magic value or not?
> 
> >  Or we need to see whether Fabiano's handshake can
> > simplify this, because the handshake will also re-design the channel
> > establishment protocol.
> 
> * May I know more about this handshake change? Is there a repository?
> OR a page/document that describes what is being planned? Is it just
> channel establishment change or there's more to it?

After a 2nd thought, maybe we don't need a new compat property, and this
should work even before handshake ready.

Firstly, we'll need a way to tell mgmt that the new qemu binary supports
enablement of both multifd + postcopy feature.  That can be done with a

  "features": [ "postcopy-with-multifd-precopy" ]

Flag attached to the QMP "migrate" command.

Then, I think we don't need a magic for preempt channel, because new qemu
binaries (after 7.2) have no issue on out-of-order connections between main
/ preempt channel.  Preempt channel is always connected later than main.

It means in the test logic of "which channel is which", it should be:

  - If it's a multifd channel (check multifd header match), it's a multifd
    channel, otherwise,

    - if main channel is not present yet, it must be the main channel (and
      we can double check the main channel magic), otherwise,

    - it's the preempt channel

With that, I think we can drop the new magic sent here.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 15:09 [PATCH 0/5] Allow to enable multifd and postcopy migration together Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] migration/multifd: move macros to multifd header Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] migration/postcopy: magic value for postcopy channel Prasad Pandit
     [not found]   ` <ZyTnBwpOwXcHGGPJ@x1n>
2024-11-04 12:32     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:18       ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-11-05 11:19         ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 13:00           ` Peter Xu
2024-11-06 12:19             ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-06 13:11               ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-07 12:05                 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-07 12:11                   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-07 12:33                   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-07 16:17                     ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 16:57                       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-07 17:45                         ` Peter Xu
2024-11-08 12:37                           ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-08 13:25                             ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-11-06 16:00               ` Peter Xu
2024-11-07 11:52                 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-07 15:56                   ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] migration: remove multifd check with postcopy Prasad Pandit
     [not found]   ` <ZyTnWYyHlrJUYQRB@x1n>
2024-11-04 12:23     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 16:52       ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05  9:50         ` Prasad Pandit
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] migration: refactor ram_save_target_page functions Prasad Pandit
     [not found]   ` <ZyToBbvfWkIZ_40W@x1n>
2024-11-04 11:56     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:00       ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 10:01         ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 13:01           ` Peter Xu
2024-10-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] migration: enable multifd and postcopy together Prasad Pandit
2024-11-04 17:48   ` Peter Xu
2024-11-05 11:54     ` Prasad Pandit
2024-11-05 16:55       ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZykB3voFw_-ByWfh@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=pjp@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.