From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>, Jason Liu <jason.hui.liu@nxp.com>,
"open list:INPUT (KEYBOARD, MOUSE, JOYSTICK,
TOUCHSCREEN)..." <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Input: bbnsm_pwrkey - add remove hook
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:48:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZymxvLMkkktRoCXZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104031552.3475108-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Hi Peng,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:15:51AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> Without remove hook to clear wake irq, there will be kernel dump when
> doing module test.
> "bbnsm_pwrkey 44440000.bbnsm:pwrkey: wake irq already initialized"
>
> Add remove hook to clear wake irq and set wakeup to false.
>
> Fixes: 40e40fdfec3f ("Input: bbnsm_pwrkey - add bbnsm power key support")
> Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V2:
> Per Christophe JAILLET
> Use remove, not remove_new
> Drop checking bbnsm pointer in remove
>
> drivers/input/misc/nxp-bbnsm-pwrkey.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/nxp-bbnsm-pwrkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/nxp-bbnsm-pwrkey.c
> index eb4173f9c820..f0bf119309dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/nxp-bbnsm-pwrkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/nxp-bbnsm-pwrkey.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,16 @@ static int bbnsm_pwrkey_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void bbnsm_pwrkey_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct bbnsm_pwrkey *bbnsm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&pdev->dev);
I wonder, could we have this done in the driver core instead of
individual drivers?
> + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
> +
> + input_unregister_device(bbnsm->input);
No need to call unregister here, it should happen automatically.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 3:15 [PATCH V2] Input: bbnsm_pwrkey - add remove hook Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-11-05 5:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2024-11-05 15:09 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZymxvLMkkktRoCXZ@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=jason.hui.liu@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.