From: Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] landlock01: used fixed size for rule_small_size
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:43:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zyn2wDmgcI+ri9SH@wegao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105041326.18531-2-liwang@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:13:25PM +0800, Li Wang wrote:
> The landlock01 test is failing on kernel v6.12-rc6 with the
> following error:
>
> landlock01.c:49: TFAIL: Size is too small expected EINVAL: ENOMSG (42)
>
> Previously, rule_small_size was calculated conditionally based
> on the presence of the handled_access_net field in the struct
> landlock_ruleset_attr.
>
> However, the kernel's landlock_create_ruleset() function still uses
> the size up to handled_access_fs to determine the minimal acceptable
> size for backward compatibility, regardless of any new fields added.
>
> According to the Landlock maintainer[1], this behavior will remain
> for backward compatibility reasons. Therefore, it's unnecessary to
> conditionally adjust rule_small_size based on new fields.
>
> This patch simplifies the test by setting rule_small_size to
> 'sizeof(__u64) - 1', which effectively tests the minimal size based
> on handled_access_fs.
>
> [1] https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2024-July/039084.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/landlock/landlock01.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/landlock/landlock01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/landlock/landlock01.c
> index 083685c64..c375e5154 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/landlock/landlock01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/landlock/landlock01.c
> @@ -62,11 +62,17 @@ static void setup(void)
>
> rule_size = sizeof(struct landlock_ruleset_attr);
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_LANDLOCK_RULESET_ATTR_HANDLED_ACCESS_NET
> - rule_small_size = rule_size - sizeof(uint64_t) - 1;
> -#else
> - rule_small_size = rule_size - 1;
> -#endif
Since we do not need HAVE_STRUCT_LANDLOCK_RULESET_ATTR_HANDLED_ACCESS_NET anymore, so i suppose we can remove
following change in configure.ac?
AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct landlock_ruleset_attr.handled_access_net],,,[#include <linux/landlock.h>])
> + /*
> + * Kernel introduces two new fields 'handled_access_net' and 'scoped'
> + * in the structure 'landlock_ruleset_attr'. However, in the function
> + * 'landlock_create_ruleset()', it still uses the first field
> + * 'handled_access_fs' to calculate the minimal size for backward
> + * compatibility reason.
> + *
> + * Therefore, here test 'sizeof(__u64) - 1' is sufficient to determine
> + * the minimum size for 'rule_small_size'.
> + */
> + rule_small_size = sizeof(__u64) - 1;
>
> rule_big_size = SAFE_SYSCONF(_SC_PAGESIZE) + 1;
> }
> --
> 2.47.0
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 4:13 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] lapi: Add new field socket scoping to landlock_ruleset_attr Li Wang
2024-11-05 4:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] landlock01: used fixed size for rule_small_size Li Wang
2024-11-05 10:43 ` Wei Gao via ltp [this message]
2024-11-05 12:00 ` Li Wang
2024-11-05 10:43 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] lapi: Add new field socket scoping to landlock_ruleset_attr Wei Gao via ltp
2024-11-05 11:20 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zyn2wDmgcI+ri9SH@wegao \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.