Re: [PATCH 7/8] reftable/merged: drain priority queue on reseek

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 07:23:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
> > Did you mean REFTABLE_HASH_SIZE_SHA1 instead?
> 
> Ah, that transition hasn't happened yet on 'master'.  I'll carry the
> semantic conflict resoluion in merge-fix hierarchy then.
> 
> > diff --git i/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-merged.c w/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-merged.c
> > index 620803e0ed..a12bd0e1a3 100644
> > --- i/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-merged.c
> > +++ w/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-merged.c
> > @@ -326,14 +326,14 @@ static void t_merged_seek_multiple_times_without_draining(void)
> >  	check(!err);
> >  	err = reftable_iterator_next_ref(&it, &rec);
> >  	check(!err);
> > -	err = reftable_ref_record_equal(&rec, &r2[0], GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ);
> > +	err = reftable_ref_record_equal(&rec, &r2[0], REFTABLE_HASH_SIZE_SHA1);
> >  	check(err == 1);
> >  
> >  	err = reftable_iterator_seek_ref(&it, "a");
> >  	check(!err);
> >  	err = reftable_iterator_next_ref(&it, &rec);
> >  	check(!err);
> > -	err = reftable_ref_record_equal(&rec, &r1[0], GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ);
> > +	err = reftable_ref_record_equal(&rec, &r1[0], REFTABLE_HASH_SIZE_SHA1);
> >  	check(err == 1);
> >  
> >  	for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bufs); i++)

This looks good to me. I guess I may end up resending this topic with a
new merge base in case the other failures are caused by that semantic
merge conflict, too.

Thanks!

Patrick