From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:40:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyrXGPlVfAVUCfTO@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b00ec74-4dda-48d4-b74f-9ce45cf1a429@linaro.org>
Hi Philippe,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 10:54:07PM +0000, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 22:54:07 +0000
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology
>
> Hi Zhao,
>
> On 1/11/24 09:33, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > This is my v5, if you think it's okay, could this feature get the final
> > merge? (Before the 9.2 cycle ends) :-)
>
>
> > ---
> > Zhao Liu (8):
> > i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level
> > hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic
> > qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine
> > hw/core: Check smp cache topology support for machine
> > hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level
>
> Since the first patches aim to be generic I took the liberty to
> queue them via the hw-misc tree. The rest really belongs to the
> x86 tree.
Thank you! I'm glad I could catch the last train for version 9.2.
> > i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology
> > i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration
> > i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine
> > Alireza Sanaee (1):
> > i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration
> >
I'll continue to push the rest during the merge window of v10.0.
Thanks,
Zhao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 8:33 [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2026-04-28 8:42 ` Ewan Hai
2026-04-28 9:43 ` EwanHai
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-11-05 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-11-06 2:40 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyrXGPlVfAVUCfTO@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.