From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc (orbyte.nwl.cc [151.80.46.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3108206515 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=151.80.46.58 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730913232; cv=none; b=Edz1B9suqaZ2mIO4iB1TswvQtW+dCdH6R/y8qIV5PkVVMPyCUgrMrA/54Zf2bTjd0mtuD8q1TECkDUUeXsKZtT27O5P4Ylin38GHOBSOYH2nMMIjdR4zyesh72atLQxL4HBRo/UZAvhsG3kGK0OzVjBwnc7ASDo6/vdgT9fYTxU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730913232; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Uqp8q28RFHP9bm17HUI0ix1MU//UVDMncA/oz9M9pPA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GyFxAsy07e9u51dVtbuQ01miyBOGi9Nalooygp4il33inKmIWVZfmOCIIHcJU/v9qFi8GC9m5gWPb9mLPOpsm3qOHsbvb7TOUUU6zXrXy+it/caDsGLL5StMz8bE5bdolFKoz18c8OVtuzM7e4GmR4edPeLBk+ZL93F6X4HiqrA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nwl.cc; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nwl.cc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nwl.cc header.i=@nwl.cc header.b=pVv7uGtd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=151.80.46.58 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nwl.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nwl.cc Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nwl.cc header.i=@nwl.cc header.b="pVv7uGtd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nwl.cc; s=mail2022; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zwwbSmm3JNpVdLco4n2v2KlN9Ger+P2mbHbc/amkrzg=; b=pVv7uGtdQdrLya4bZfQDeiQ7Ha BMahv4d8aDW2J4thYDrnpQn04fRA4AoZuAFWkfveS3B3iSduBVklTyjKEkfks1eBTXzUb/rR/gqgB qMAO5SQd5XaFNEzvb8GTTKGR8CjNWkFZiuN2f94qxTvqetEsWmk4iqj7JwlC/XRHyryHjrSOvVET3 wldYVczbCw22TkhTrzU93t+ae9adx5T5WM4Ax+rAeGeKko6EpYy/JnbHh7Mq45T3eqQO9Rkdnk7QG 7h8qPh/TVYKPa8WLd+mdGxMsBwzgfCIQcckSX236gqkfwvDhgSLlc6ynpgNujANeN4EXev5+9ERWJ DXQYyK4w==; Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8jbJ-000000005tb-0Xdv for netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 18:13:49 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:13:49 +0100 From: Phil Sutter To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH 1/5] tests: shell: iptables/0010-wait_0 is unreliable Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20241106164232.3384-1-phil@nwl.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241106164232.3384-1-phil@nwl.cc> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 05:42:28PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > Sometimes the test would fail, especially after removing > /run/xtables.lock file. Looks like the supposedly blocking > iptables-restore coproc sometimes takes a moment to set things up. > > Fixes: 63ab5b8906f69 ("iptables-legacy: Fix for mandatory lock waiting") > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter Series applied.