Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] rust: Add read_poll_timeout functions

[Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>]

On Wed 2024-11-06 13:35:09, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 10:01:20AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > Add read_poll_timeout functions which poll periodically until a
> > condition is met or a timeout is reached.
> > 
> > C's read_poll_timeout (include/linux/iopoll.h) is a complicated macro
> > and a simple wrapper for Rust doesn't work. So this implements the
> > same functionality in Rust.
> > 
> > The C version uses usleep_range() while the Rust version uses
> > fsleep(), which uses the best sleep method so it works with spans that
> > usleep_range() doesn't work nicely with.
> > 
> > Unlike the C version, __might_sleep() is used instead of might_sleep()
> > to show proper debug info; the file name and line
> > number. might_resched() could be added to match what the C version
> > does but this function works without it.
> > 
> > The sleep_before_read argument isn't supported since there is no user
> > for now. It's rarely used in the C version.
> > 
> > For the proper debug info, readx_poll_timeout() and __might_sleep()
> > are implemented as a macro. We could implement them as a normal
> > function if there is a clean way to get a null-terminated string
> > without allocation from core::panic::Location::file().
> > 
> 
> So printk() actually support printing a string with a precison value,
> that is: a format string "%.*s" would take two inputs, one for the length
> and the other for the pointer to the string, for example you can do:
> 
> 	char *msg = "hello";
> 
> 	printk("%.*s\n", 5, msg);
> 
> This is similar to printf() in glibc [1].
> 
> If we add another __might_sleep_precision() which accepts a file name
> length:
> 
> 	void __might_sleep_precision(const char *file, int len, int line)
> 
> then we don't need to use macro here, I've attached a diff based
> on your whole patchset, and it seems working.
> 
> Cc printk folks to if they know any limitation on using precision.

I am not aware of any printk() limitation here. The "%.*s" format
should work the same way as in printf() in the userspace.

Best Regards,
Petr