Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] leds: gpio: Avoid using GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 10:45:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:37 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > -       if (template->active_low)
> > -               flags |= GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW;
> > -
> > -       ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, template->gpio, flags,
> > +       ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, template->gpio, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW,
> >                                     template->name);
> 
> Just wondering, as I am not 100% sure: can this change change the
> initial state of the GPIO?

You probably wonder how ACTIVE_LOW affects the OUT_INIT_LOW given above.
I have an answer to you, however I might be mistaken as well, but I spent some
time to investigate.

The above mentioned call ends up in the gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit() which
uses the value (low in this case) as an absolute value. It does not include the
ACTIVE_LOW in the value calculations. Hence, setting ACTIVE_LOW before or afterwards
has no effect on the existing flow.

If you notice a mistake, please elaborate this, so I can fix the approach!

> >         if (ret < 0)
> >                 return ERR_PTR(ret);

...

> > +       if (template->active_low ^ gpiod_is_active_low(gpiod))
> > +               gpiod_toggle_active_low(gpiod);
> > +

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko