All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric@garver.life
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] json: collapse set element commands from parser
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:01:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzSG8xWKI5Re0Xcy@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzPAE3Gj6qoA8ZAk@orbyte.nwl.cc>

Hi Phil,

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 09:52:35PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:04:11PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Side note: While profiling, I can still see lots json objects, this
> > results in memory consumption that is 5 times than native
> > representation. Error reporting is also lagging behind, it should be
> > possible to add a json_t pointer to struct location to relate
> > expressions and json objects.
> 
> I can't quite reproduce this. When restoring a ruleset with ~12.7k
> elements in individual standard syntax commands, valgrind prints:
> 
> | HEAP SUMMARY:
> |     in use at exit: 59,802 bytes in 582 blocks
> |   total heap usage: 954,970 allocs,
> |                     954,388 frees,
> |                  18,300,874 bytes allocated
> 
> Repeating the same in JSON syntax, I get:
> 
> | HEAP SUMMARY:
> |     in use at exit: 61,592 bytes in 647 blocks
> |   total heap usage: 1,200,164 allocs,
> |                     1,199,517 frees,
> |                    38,612,257 bytes allocated
> 
> So this is 38MB vs 18MB? At least far from the mentioned 5 times. Would
> you mind sharing how you got to that number?
> 
> Please kindly find my reproducers attached for reference.

I am using valgrind --tool=massif to measure memory consumption in
userspace.

I used these two files:

- set-init.json-nft, to create the table and set.
- set-65535.nft-json, to create a small set with 64K elements.

then I run:

valgrind --tool=massif nft -f set-65535.nft-json

there is a tool:

ms_print massif.out.XYZ

At "peak time" in heap memory consumption, I can see 60% is consumed
in json objects.

I am looking at the commands and expressions to reduce memory
consumption there. The result of that work will also help json
support.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-31 22:04 [PATCH nft] json: collapse set element commands from parser Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-11-01 14:55 ` Eric Garver
2024-11-05 13:35 ` Phil Sutter
2024-11-05 16:51   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-11-05 17:07     ` Phil Sutter
2024-11-13 11:08       ` improving json error reporting [was Re: [PATCH nft] json: collapse set element commands from parser] Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-11-13 14:18         ` Phil Sutter
2024-11-12 20:52 ` [PATCH nft] json: collapse set element commands from parser Phil Sutter
2024-11-13 11:01   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-11-13 11:34     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-11-13 14:35     ` Phil Sutter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzSG8xWKI5Re0Xcy@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=eric@garver.life \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.