All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Eric Farman" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] fs/proc/vmcore: kdump support for virtio-mem on s390
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:46:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzcKY8hap3OMqTjC@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025151134.1275575-1-david@redhat.com>

On 10/25/24 at 05:11pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This is based on "[PATCH v3 0/7] virtio-mem: s390 support" [1], which adds
> virtio-mem support on s390.
> 
> The only "different than everything else" thing about virtio-mem on s390
> is kdump: The crash (2nd) kernel allocates+prepares the elfcore hdr
> during fs_init()->vmcore_init()->elfcorehdr_alloc(). Consequently, the
> crash kernel must detect memory ranges of the crashed/panicked kernel to
> include via PT_LOAD in the vmcore.
> 
> On other architectures, all RAM regions (boot + hotplugged) can easily be
> observed on the old (to crash) kernel (e.g., using /proc/iomem) to create
> the elfcore hdr.
> 
> On s390, information about "ordinary" memory (heh, "storage") can be
> obtained by querying the hypervisor/ultravisor via SCLP/diag260, and
> that information is stored early during boot in the "physmem" memblock
> data structure.
> 
> But virtio-mem memory is always detected by as device driver, which is
> usually build as a module. So in the crash kernel, this memory can only be
                                       ~~~~~~~~~~~
                                       Is it 1st kernel or 2nd kernel?
Usually we call the 1st kernel as panicked kernel, crashed kernel, the
2nd kernel as kdump kernel. 
> properly detected once the virtio-mem driver started up.
> 
> The virtio-mem driver already supports the "kdump mode", where it won't
> hotplug any memory but instead queries the device to implement the
> pfn_is_ram() callback, to avoid reading unplugged memory holes when reading
> the vmcore.
> 
> With this series, if the virtio-mem driver is included in the kdump
> initrd -- which dracut already takes care of under Fedora/RHEL -- it will
> now detect the device RAM ranges on s390 once it probes the devices, to add
> them to the vmcore using the same callback mechanism we already have for
> pfn_is_ram().

Do you mean on s390 virtio-mem memory region will be detected and added
to vmcore in kdump kernel when virtio-mem driver is initialized? Not
sure if I understand it correctly.

> 
> To add these device RAM ranges to the vmcore ("patch the vmcore"), we will
> add new PT_LOAD entries that describe these memory ranges, and update
> all offsets vmcore size so it is all consistent.
> 
> Note that makedumfile is shaky with v6.12-rcX, I made the "obvious" things
> (e.g., free page detection) work again while testing as documented in [2].
> 
> Creating the dumps using makedumpfile seems to work fine, and the
> dump regions (PT_LOAD) are as expected. I yet have to check in more detail
> if the created dumps are good (IOW, the right memory was dumped, but it
> looks like makedumpfile reads the right memory when interpreting the
> kernel data structures, which is promising).
> 
> Patch #1 -- #6 are vmcore preparations and cleanups
> Patch #7 adds the infrastructure for drivers to report device RAM
> Patch #8 + #9 are virtio-mem preparations
> Patch #10 implements virtio-mem support to report device RAM
> Patch #11 activates it for s390, implementing a new function to fill
>           PT_LOAD entry for device RAM
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241025141453.1210600-1-david@redhat.com
> [2] https://github.com/makedumpfile/makedumpfile/issues/16
> 
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> 
> David Hildenbrand (11):
>   fs/proc/vmcore: convert vmcore_cb_lock into vmcore_mutex
>   fs/proc/vmcore: replace vmcoredd_mutex by vmcore_mutex
>   fs/proc/vmcore: disallow vmcore modifications after the vmcore was
>     opened
>   fs/proc/vmcore: move vmcore definitions from kcore.h to crash_dump.h
>   fs/proc/vmcore: factor out allocating a vmcore memory node
>   fs/proc/vmcore: factor out freeing a list of vmcore ranges
>   fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM
>     ranges in 2nd kernel
>   virtio-mem: mark device ready before registering callbacks in kdump
>     mode
>   virtio-mem: remember usable region size
>   virtio-mem: support CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM
>   s390/kdump: virtio-mem kdump support (CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM)
> 
>  arch/s390/Kconfig             |   1 +
>  arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c |  39 +++--
>  drivers/virtio/Kconfig        |   1 +
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c   | 103 +++++++++++++-
>  fs/proc/Kconfig               |  25 ++++
>  fs/proc/vmcore.c              | 258 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/linux/crash_dump.h    |  47 +++++++
>  include/linux/kcore.h         |  13 --
>  8 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.46.1
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25 15:11 [PATCH v1 00/11] fs/proc/vmcore: kdump support for virtio-mem on s390 David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] fs/proc/vmcore: convert vmcore_cb_lock into vmcore_mutex David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15  9:30   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15 10:03     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20  8:16       ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20  8:56         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] fs/proc/vmcore: replace vmcoredd_mutex by vmcore_mutex David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15  9:32   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15 10:04     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20  8:14       ` Baoquan He
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] fs/proc/vmcore: disallow vmcore modifications after the vmcore was opened David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-22  9:16   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-22  9:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-25 14:41       ` Baoquan He
2024-11-29 10:38         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-03 10:42           ` Baoquan He
2024-12-03 10:51             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] fs/proc/vmcore: move vmcore definitions from kcore.h to crash_dump.h David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15  9:44   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15  9:59     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20  9:42       ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 10:28         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-21  4:35           ` Baoquan He
2024-11-21 15:37             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] fs/proc/vmcore: factor out allocating a vmcore memory node David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20  9:45   ` Baoquan He
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] fs/proc/vmcore: factor out freeing a list of vmcore ranges David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20  9:46   ` Baoquan He
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM ranges in 2nd kernel David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 10:13   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 10:48     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 14:05       ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 14:39         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-21  4:30           ` Baoquan He
2024-11-21 19:47             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-22  7:51               ` Baoquan He
2024-11-22  7:31   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-22  9:47     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] virtio-mem: mark device ready before registering callbacks in kdump mode David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] virtio-mem: remember usable region size David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] virtio-mem: support CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] s390/kdump: virtio-mem kdump support (CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM) David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-04  6:21 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] fs/proc/vmcore: kdump support for virtio-mem on s390 Baoquan He
2024-11-04  6:21   ` Baoquan He
2024-11-15  8:46 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-11-15  8:55   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15  9:48     ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzcKY8hap3OMqTjC@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.