All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
To: Ziyi Guo <guoziyi114@gmail.com>,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	alex@ghiti.fr
Cc: thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: futex: untag the user pointer before the atomic access
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 01:37:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a25d01cd-e21d-4e51-9d24-6cc41589c041@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001184355.2395068-1-guoziyi114@gmail.com>

On 2026-10-01 8:43 PM, Ziyi Guo wrote:
> access_ok() checks untagged_addr(uaddr), but arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser()
> and futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() hand the raw uaddr to the inline asm
> amoswap/amoadd/.../lr.w+sc.w through the "+m" (*uaddr) operand.  When the
> tagged address ABI is enabled (CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM, prctl
> PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL with PMLEN != 0), those two addresses differ: a
> user pointer whose top PMLEN bits hold a tag passes access_ok() after
> untagging, but the atomic is then performed on the still-tagged raw
> address.
> 
> Supervisor-mode data accesses are not subject to the U-mode pointer
> masking (that is governed by menvcfg.PMM, which the kernel does not set),
> so hardware does not strip the tag for the kernel's own access.  With
> Sv57 and PMLEN=16 the tag bits overlap the canonical-address bits, so a
> tagged pointer can name a canonical kernel virtual address (e.g. in the
> linear map) whose untagged form is a valid user address.  An unprivileged

Thankfully, the combination Sv57 + PMLEN=16 is unlikely to be in use because the
address bit overlap tends to create performance problems.

> process can thus make FUTEX_WAKE_OP perform an atomic read-modify-write on
> an arbitrary kernel address, with the matching FUTEX_OP_CMP_* result
> serving as a read oracle.
> 
> get_user()/put_user()/raw_copy_{to,from}_user() already untag the pointer
> after the access_ok() check; do the same in the futex helpers so the
> atomic operates on the address that was actually validated.

> Fixes: 2e1743085887 ("riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI")
> Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <guoziyi114@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> index 90c86b115e00..8d80e580eec5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *uaddr)
>  
>  	if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> +	uaddr = untagged_addr(uaddr);   /* FIX: operate on the checked address */
>  
>  	switch (op) {
>  	case FUTEX_OP_SET:
> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *uaddr,
>  
>  	if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> +	uaddr = untagged_addr(uaddr);   /* FIX: operate on the checked address */

The comments are not necessary. The reason for the change is in the commit log.
With them removed:

Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>

>  
>  	__enable_user_access();
>  	__asm__ __volatile__ (


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 18:43 [PATCH] riscv: futex: untag the user pointer before the atomic access Ziyi Guo
2026-10-05 23:37 ` Samuel Holland [this message]
2026-10-06 14:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Ziyi Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a25d01cd-e21d-4e51-9d24-6cc41589c041@sifive.com \
    --to=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=guoziyi114@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.