All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, lgci.bug.filing@intel.com
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for Don’t assume sequential GT IDs
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:57:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2edc50b-efcc-4c30-bb5a-95ff28c3010b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175741460941.316360.9510237144998041036@1538d3639d33>



On 9/9/2025 12:43 PM, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: Don’t assume sequential GT IDs
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/154199/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8526_FULL -> XEIGTPW_13705_FULL
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>    **FAILURE**
> 
>    Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_13705_FULL absolutely need to be
>    verified manually.
>    
>    If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>    introduced in XEIGTPW_13705_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>    to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>    
> 
> Participating hosts (4 -> 3)
> ------------------------------
> 
>    Missing    (1): shard-adlp
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>    Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_13705_FULL:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>    * igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_guc_log_init:
>      - shard-bmg:          [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>     [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8526/shard-bmg-1/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_guc_log_init.html
>     [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13705/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_fault_injection@inject-fault-probe-function-xe_guc_log_init.html
> 
>    * igt@xe_pm@s4-d3hot-basic-exec:
>      - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
>     [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8526/shard-dg2-464/igt@xe_pm@s4-d3hot-basic-exec.html
>     [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13705/shard-dg2-464/igt@xe_pm@s4-d3hot-basic-exec.html
> 

Not related to the change.
--
marcin

>    
> New tests
> ---------
> 
>    New tests have been introduced between XEIGT_8526_FULL and XEIGTPW_13705_FULL:
> 
> ### New IGT tests (3) ###
> 
>    * igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-use-after-nonblocking-unbind@pipe-a-hdmi-a-2:
>      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
>      - Exec time: [0.13] s
> 
>    * igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-use-after-nonblocking-unbind@pipe-b-hdmi-a-2:
>      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
>      - Exec time: [0.14] s
> 
>    * igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-sliding-64x64@pipe-d-hdmi-a-2:
>      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
>      - Exec time: [3.60] s
> 
>    
> 
> Known issues
> ------------
> 
[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-08 16:07 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Don’t assume sequential GT IDs Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-09-08 16:07 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/xe/xe_query: Don’t assume sequential GT IDs in xe_gt_type() Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-09-09  8:23   ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-09-08 16:07 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_sriov_flr: Use xe_for_each_gt() for GT iteration Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-09-09  8:26   ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-09-09  2:38 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Don’t assume sequential GT IDs Patchwork
2025-09-09  2:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-09 10:43 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-09 13:57   ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2025-09-09 18:13 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-09-10  7:45   ` Bernatowicz, Marcin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2edc50b-efcc-4c30-bb5a-95ff28c3010b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lgci.bug.filing@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.