From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from stoexhubfe02.domain01.net (STOEXHUBFE02.domain01.net [83.145.59.141]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430DFE014F3 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 2.70.208.156.mobile.tre.se (2.70.208.156) by stoexhubfe02.domain01.net (10.12.10.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:47:22 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Anders Darander Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:47:18 +0200 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans_Beck=E9rus?= , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Message-ID: X-GFI-SMTP-Submission: 1 Subject: Re: gnupg vs gpgme X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:47:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, "Hans Beckérus" wrote: >Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can tell >gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need for >any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. Cheers, Anders >Hans >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB          Tel: +46 702 44 84 36 Laxholmstorget 3        Email: anders@chargestorm.se 602 21 Norrköping       Web: www.chargestorm.se Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.