From: agustinv@codeaurora.org (agustinv at codeaurora.org)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V1] perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:56:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3abed24d82e0a90a5b782219fa24d84@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160321090400.GQ6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2016-03-21 05:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:37:02PM -0400, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>> This adds a new dynamic PMU to the Perf Events framework to program
>> and control the L3 cache PMUs in some Qualcomm Technologies SOCs.
>>
>> The driver supports a distributed cache architecture where the overall
>> cache is comprised of multiple slices each with its own PMU. The
>> driver
>> aggregates counts across the whole system to provide a global picture
>> of the metrics selected by the user.
>
> So is there never a situation where you want to profile just a single
> slice?
No, access to each individual slice is determined by hashing based on
the target address.
>
> It userspace at all aware of these slices through other means?
Userspace is not aware of the actual topology.
>
> That is; typically we do not aggregate in-kernel like this but simply
> expose each slice as a separate PMU and let userspace sort things.
My decision of single vs. multiple PMUs was based on reducing the
overhead required of retrieving the system-wide counts, which would
require multiple system calls in the multiple-PMU case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 20:37 [PATCH V1] perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver Agustin Vega-Frias
2016-03-21 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 15:56 ` agustinv at codeaurora.org [this message]
2016-03-21 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 10:35 ` Mark Rutland
2016-03-21 10:54 ` Will Deacon
2016-03-21 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 16:37 ` agustinv at codeaurora.org
2016-03-21 16:06 ` agustinv at codeaurora.org
2016-03-22 18:33 ` agustinv at codeaurora.org
[not found] ` <56F26FF1.90002@arm.com>
2016-03-23 12:36 ` agustinv at codeaurora.org
2016-03-23 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-22 20:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3abed24d82e0a90a5b782219fa24d84@codeaurora.org \
--to=agustinv@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.