From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>,
Haon KIM <akrn112@naver.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vrf: Set L3MDEV OIF flag for outbound lookups
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 08:35:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3e50c6f-0da2-4e77-80b5-2ae371676280@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auH8PdGEPaf2GI73@luna.proxmox.com>
[ cc author of referenced Fixes commit ]
On 10/28/26 7:57 AM, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> On 27.10.2026 01:47, Haon KIM wrote:
>> The IPv4 and IPv6 outbound processing paths in the VRF driver
>> set the L3 master device index in the flow structure before
>> performing route lookups, but do not set
>> FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF.
>>
>> Both the IPv4 and IPv6 outbound processing paths contain
>> the comment "needed to match OIF rule", indicating that
>> the L3 master device index is needed to match OIF rules.
>> However, FIB rule matching requires both
>> FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF and a matching flowi_l3mdev index
>> to match a rule specifying the VRF master as the output
>> interface.
>>
>> The matching logic introduced by commit 2d300ce0b783
>> ("net: fib_rules: Fix iif / oif matching on L3 master device")
>> requires FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF to be set for OIF rules to
>> match the VRF master. The existing outbound processing paths
>> set the L3 master device index directly, so
>> l3mdev_update_flow() does not set this flag.
>>
>> Consequently, OIF rules specifying the VRF master may fail
>> to match these flows.
>>
>> Set FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF in both outbound processing paths
>> so that FIB rules can correctly match the VRF master as the
>> output interface.
>>
>> The issue was identified by code inspection. Runtime testing
>> has not been performed.
Please do not do that; do some testing before sending patches.
>>
>> Fixes: 2d300ce0b783 ("net: fib_rules: Fix iif / oif matching on L3 master device")
>
> I think this should be:
>
> Fixes: 40867d74c374 ("net: Add l3mdev index to flow struct and avoid oif reset for port devices")
No, the Fixes above is correct if there is a bug; the
FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF flag was introduced by 2d300ce0b783 and was not
present for 40867d74c374.
That said, unless I am misremembering something the flag does not need
to be set in this outbound path.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Haon KIM <akrn112@naver.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/vrf.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
>> index 79d433f49f80..f22ac91fefd4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
>> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v6_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> fl6.flowlabel = ip6_flowinfo(iph);
>> fl6.flowi6_mark = skb->mark;
>> fl6.flowi6_proto = iph->nexthdr;
>> + fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF;
>>
>> dst = ip6_dst_lookup_flow(net, NULL, &fl6, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(dst) || dst == dst_null)
>> @@ -506,7 +507,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> fl4.flowi4_l3mdev = vrf_dev->ifindex;
>> fl4.flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX;
>> fl4.flowi4_dscp = ip4h_dscp(ip4h);
>> - fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC;
>> + fl4.flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC | FLOWI_FLAG_L3MDEV_OIF;
>> fl4.flowi4_proto = ip4h->protocol;
>> fl4.daddr = ip4h->daddr;
>> fl4.saddr = ip4h->saddr;
>
> Also this is a breaking change, before the patch, this rule matched:
>
> ip rule add iif vrf0 table 100
>
> After the patch, this one matches (and the iif rule above no longer does):
>
> ip rule add oif vrf0 table 100
>
> A selftest would also be nice.
See commit message in cited Fixes commit. Have you checked
fib_rule_tests.sh? If not, try the commands in 2d300ce0b783 and if they
are broken, there is a problem. If not, let's get them added to the
selftest.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 16:47 [PATCH net] net: vrf: Set L3MDEV OIF flag for outbound lookups Haon KIM
2026-10-28 13:57 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-10-28 14:35 ` David Ahern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3e50c6f-0da2-4e77-80b5-2ae371676280@kernel.org \
--to=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=akrn112@naver.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.