Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3 5/5] mesa: Fix missing GLES3 headers in SDK sysroot

[Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com>]

On 12/23/2024 5:28 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>
>> +# GLES2 and GLES3 implementations are packaged in a single library in libgles2-mesa.
>> +# Add a dependency so the GLES3 dev package is associated with its implementation.
>> +RDEPENDS:libgles2-mesa-dev += "libgles3-mesa-dev"
>> +
>>   RDEPENDS:libopencl-mesa += "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'opencl', 'libclc spirv-tools', '', d)}"
> 
> This doesn't quite make sense to me. The line above that RDEPENDS is
> adding a dependency in the opposite direction and will effectively make
> one package uninstallable without the other.
> 
> The question is does the libgles2-mesa-dev package need the libgles3-
> mesa-dev package? If not, this is not the right way to solve the
> problem you're seeing.
> 

Does this work better, signifying that libgles2-mesa contains libgles3-
mesa?

+RDEPENDS:libgles2-mesa += "libgles3-mesa"
+ALLOW_EMPTY:libgles3-mesa = "1"

Tom