From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] SPDX: Add annotations to relationship From: "Richard Purdie" Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 20:50:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20211027013050.137364-1-saul.wold@windriver.com> <5a8c05846279f160ee2d5fe7ef7502c29e1bfee1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <2035d95566fd1cb0453186cc8034f234b9e9fc98.camel@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-id: To: Joshua Watt , Jose Quaresma Cc: Steve Sakoman , Saul Wold , OE-core On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 15:45 -0500, Joshua Watt wrote: > On 11/4/21 3:43 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 20:00 +0000, Jose Quaresma wrote: > > > > > > Richard Purdie escreveu no dia quinta, > > > 28/10/2021 à(s) 21:58: > > > > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 08:47 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:41 PM Jose Quaresma > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > There are any plans or is it possible to backport the SBOM/SPDX to the > > > > dunfell branch? > > > > > I'm going to yield to Saul as to whether he thinks this is > > > > > desirable/possible or not. > > > > The packagedata changes are pretty invasive unfortunately and likely not > > > > something you're going to want in dunfell sadly. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the clarification. > > > > > I have been thinking a bit more about this. I did wonder if we should consider a > > mixin layer of some kind for it that could work with dunfell? > > > > We could host it, it is just a question of writing the mixin layer and > > maintaining it. > > I don't think it's going to be possible with a pure mixin layer, since > it relies on the extended package data? I suspect that could perhaps be patched in through a layer though? You might choose to drop the compression piece or do it differently for the backport? Cheers, Richard