RE: [PATCH 1/1] test/bpf: remove redundant library guard

[Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>]

> The app/test/meson.build already adds 'bpf' as a dependency to test_bpf.c.
> If the bpf library is disabled, the test source file is excluded from
> the build entirely.
> 
> Therefore, the RTE_LIB_BPF guard is dead code and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_bpf.c | 17 ++---------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_bpf.c b/app/test/test_bpf.c
> index 3205afaa63..88ee8ec224 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_bpf.c
> @@ -15,24 +15,12 @@
>  #include <rte_random.h>
>  #include <rte_byteorder.h>
>  #include <rte_errno.h>
> -
> -#include "test.h"
> -
> -#if !defined(RTE_LIB_BPF)
> -
> -static int
> -test_bpf(void)
> -{
> -	printf("BPF not supported, skipping test\n");
> -	return TEST_SKIPPED;
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -
>  #include <rte_bpf.h>
>  #include <rte_ether.h>
>  #include <rte_ip.h>
> 
> +#include "test.h"
> +
> 
>  /* Tests of most simple BPF programs (no instructions, one instruction etc.) */
> 
> @@ -3744,7 +3732,6 @@ test_bpf(void)
>  	return rc;
>  }
> 
> -#endif /* !RTE_LIB_BPF */
> 
>  REGISTER_FAST_TEST(bpf_autotest, NOHUGE_OK, ASAN_OK, test_bpf);
> 
> --
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> 2.43.0