From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/huge_memory: fix folio split stats counting
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 11:45:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4bdd286-ebbf-49a2-9b98-fa5197e1a6f3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251122025529.1562592-5-ziy@nvidia.com>
On 11/22/25 03:55, Zi Yan wrote:
> The "return <error code>" statements for error checks at the beginning of
> __folio_split() skip necessary count_vm_event() and count_mthp_stat() at
> the end of the function. Fix these by replacing them with
> "ret = <error code>; goto out;".
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index ebc3ba0907fd..a42c4f29ce4f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3954,16 +3954,20 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
>
> - if (folio != page_folio(split_at) || folio != page_folio(lock_at))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (folio != page_folio(split_at) || folio != page_folio(lock_at)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> - if (new_order >= old_order)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (new_order >= old_order) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> ret = folio_check_splittable(folio, new_order, split_type,
> /* warn = */ true);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>
> if (is_anon) {
> /*
I guess this is not Fixes:/stable material. Wonder if such early (mostly
-EINVAL etc) checks were at some point not intended to be counted.
In any case
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-22 2:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] Improve folio split related functions Zi Yan
2025-11-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/huge_memory: change folio_split_supported() to folio_check_splittable() Zi Yan
2025-11-23 1:50 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-23 18:38 ` Barry Song
2025-11-24 10:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 16:38 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-25 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25 17:44 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/huge_memory: replace can_split_folio() with direct refcount calculation Zi Yan
2025-11-23 1:51 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-24 10:41 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 17:05 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-24 19:22 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 21:08 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-25 8:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25 15:55 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-25 9:10 ` Miaohe Lin
2025-11-25 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 22:14 ` Balbir Singh
2025-11-25 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25 15:41 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/huge_memory: make min_order_for_split() always return an order Zi Yan
2025-11-23 1:53 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-24 10:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 15:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-24 17:11 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/huge_memory: fix folio split stats counting Zi Yan
2025-11-23 1:56 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-24 10:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-11-24 17:23 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-24 15:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-24 17:29 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4bdd286-ebbf-49a2-9b98-fa5197e1a6f3@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.