From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudhir kumar Subject: Re: [Autotest] [AUTOTEST] [PATCH 1/2] Add latest LTP test in autotest Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:00:24 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1246863519.2865.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <33307c790907061137h3da12536q47517b1662498793@mail.gmail.com> <6ac58f4f0907070831h381a405bqdd58fdfaf132333e@mail.gmail.com> <33307c790907072140i2a09f28dx3b7d6b217e31eeef@mail.gmail.com> <4A54660C.6090509@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin Bligh , Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , Autotest mailing list , Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , Uri Lublin , kvm-devel To: dlaor@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:46018 "EHLO mail-pz0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756517AbZGHJaZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:30:25 -0400 Received: by pzk31 with SMTP id 31so3516698pzk.33 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:30:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A54660C.6090509@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dor Laor wrote: > On 07/08/2009 07:40 AM, Martin Bligh wrote: >>> >>> ATM I will suggest to merge the patches in and let get tested so that >>> we can collect failures/breakages if any. >> >> I am not keen on causing regressions, which we've risked doing every >> time we change LTP. I think we at least need to get a run on a >> non-virtualized >> machine with some recent kernel, and exclude the tests that fail every >> time. > > We can use the reported results (impressive) as a base. > When more regressions are introduced, we can chop more tests Sure, soon will send the revised patch. Thanks everyone for your thoughts!! > -- Sudhir Kumar