From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Prevent deferred probe loops
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:44:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a52c513c-ff93-4767-a370-3f7c562df7bd@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-koKBvSXTHChYYF-qSU-r1cBUbLghJZcqtJOGQZjn3BA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/10/25 19:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:35 AM Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> A deferred probe loop can occur when a device returns EPROBE_DEFER after
>> registering a bus with children:
>
> This is a broken driver. A parent device shouldn't register child
> devices unless it is fully read itself. It's not logical to say the
> child devices are available, if the parent itself isn't fully ready.
> So, adding child devices/the bus should be the last thing done in the
> parent's probe function.
>
> I know there are odd exceptions where the parent depends on the child,
> so they might add the child a bit earlier in the probe
This is exactly the case here. So the bus probing cannot happen any
later than it already does.
> but in those cases, the parent's probe should still do all the checks
> ahead of time.
Such as what? How is the parent going to know the resource is missing
without checking for it?
> Can you be more specific about the actual failure you are seeing?
MAC is looking for a PCS that's on its internal MDIO bus, but that PCS's
driver isn't loaded. The PCS has to be loaded at probe time because
phylink_create needs it, and phylink is necessary to register the
netdev. The latter situation is not ideal, but it would be quite a bit
of work to untangle.
--Sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 23:57 [BUG] Deferred probe loop with child devices Sean Anderson
2025-06-10 18:34 ` [PATCH] driver core: Prevent deferred probe loops Sean Anderson
2025-06-10 23:32 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-06-10 23:44 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2025-06-11 12:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-12 15:53 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-12 17:56 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-06-12 20:40 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-17 8:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-17 15:35 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-17 15:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-17 17:14 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-19 8:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-19 16:19 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-19 16:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a52c513c-ff93-4767-a370-3f7c562df7bd@linux.dev \
--to=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.